Improving the development, monitoring and reporting of stroke rehabilitation research: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable

Marion F Walker, Tammy C Hoffmann, Marian Brady, Catherine M Dean, Janice J Eng, Amanda J Farrin, Cynthia Felix, Anne Forster, Peter Langhorne, Elizabeth A Lynch, Kathryn A Radford, Katharina S Sunnerhagen, Caroline L. Watkins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Recent reviews have demonstrated that the quality of stroke rehabilitation research has continued to improve over the last four decades but despite this progress, there are still many barriers in moving the field forward. Rigorous development, monitoring and complete reporting of interventions in stroke trials are essential in providing rehabilitation evidence that is robust, meaningful and implementable. An international partnership of stroke rehabilitation experts committed to develop consensus-based core recommendations with a remit of addressing the issues identified as limiting stroke rehabilitation research in the areas of developing, monitoring and reporting stroke rehabilitation interventions. Work exploring each of the three areas took place via multiple teleconferences and a two-day meeting in Philadelphia in May 2016. A total of 15 recommendations were made. To validate the need for the recommendations, the group reviewed all stroke rehabilitation trials published in 2015 (n=182 papers). Our review highlighted that the majority of publications did not clearly describe how interventions were developed or monitored during the trial. In particular, under-reporting of the theoretical rationale for the intervention and the components of the intervention call into question many interventions that have been evaluated for efficacy. More trials were found to have addressed the reporting of interventions recommendations than those related to development or monitoring. Nonetheless, the majority of reporting recommendations were still not adequately described. To progress the field of stroke rehabilitation research and to ensure stroke patients receive optimal evidence-based clinical care, we urge the research community to endorse and adopt our recommendations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)877-884
JournalNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Volume10-11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Stroke
Telecommunications
Publications
Stroke Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation Research
Rehabilitation
Research

Keywords

  • stroke rehabilitation research
  • Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable

Cite this

Walker, Marion F ; Hoffmann, Tammy C ; Brady, Marian ; Dean, Catherine M ; Eng, Janice J ; Farrin, Amanda J ; Felix, Cynthia ; Forster, Anne ; Langhorne, Peter ; Lynch, Elizabeth A ; Radford, Kathryn A ; Sunnerhagen, Katharina S ; Watkins, Caroline L. / Improving the development, monitoring and reporting of stroke rehabilitation research: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair. 2017 ; Vol. 10-11. pp. 877-884.
@article{8f306599befe489590f86f4d35668ce7,
title = "Improving the development, monitoring and reporting of stroke rehabilitation research: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable",
abstract = "Recent reviews have demonstrated that the quality of stroke rehabilitation research has continued to improve over the last four decades but despite this progress, there are still many barriers in moving the field forward. Rigorous development, monitoring and complete reporting of interventions in stroke trials are essential in providing rehabilitation evidence that is robust, meaningful and implementable. An international partnership of stroke rehabilitation experts committed to develop consensus-based core recommendations with a remit of addressing the issues identified as limiting stroke rehabilitation research in the areas of developing, monitoring and reporting stroke rehabilitation interventions. Work exploring each of the three areas took place via multiple teleconferences and a two-day meeting in Philadelphia in May 2016. A total of 15 recommendations were made. To validate the need for the recommendations, the group reviewed all stroke rehabilitation trials published in 2015 (n=182 papers). Our review highlighted that the majority of publications did not clearly describe how interventions were developed or monitored during the trial. In particular, under-reporting of the theoretical rationale for the intervention and the components of the intervention call into question many interventions that have been evaluated for efficacy. More trials were found to have addressed the reporting of interventions recommendations than those related to development or monitoring. Nonetheless, the majority of reporting recommendations were still not adequately described. To progress the field of stroke rehabilitation research and to ensure stroke patients receive optimal evidence-based clinical care, we urge the research community to endorse and adopt our recommendations.",
keywords = "stroke rehabilitation research, Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable",
author = "Walker, {Marion F} and Hoffmann, {Tammy C} and Marian Brady and Dean, {Catherine M} and Eng, {Janice J} and Farrin, {Amanda J} and Cynthia Felix and Anne Forster and Peter Langhorne and Lynch, {Elizabeth A} and Radford, {Kathryn A} and Sunnerhagen, {Katharina S} and Watkins, {Caroline L.}",
note = "Acceptance date requested - author noted around same time as 25328494 (23-3-17). For this record, used the last date in the month. ET 18/4/19 Dual publication with International Journal of Stroke Note from the journal website: *This article was first published in International Journal of Stroke 2017, Volume 11, Issue 5, pages 472–479. Checked with author - ok to use AAM used for the other record ET 25328494 AAM: no embargo Available compliantly in Glasgow - Enlighten team confirmed that deposit and access date both 11/8/17, email in SAN. ET 29/10/19",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1177/1545968317732686",
language = "English",
volume = "10-11",
pages = "877--884",
journal = "Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair",
issn = "1545-9683",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

Walker, MF, Hoffmann, TC, Brady, M, Dean, CM, Eng, JJ, Farrin, AJ, Felix, C, Forster, A, Langhorne, P, Lynch, EA, Radford, KA, Sunnerhagen, KS & Watkins, CL 2017, 'Improving the development, monitoring and reporting of stroke rehabilitation research: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable', Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 10-11, pp. 877-884. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968317732686

Improving the development, monitoring and reporting of stroke rehabilitation research: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. / Walker, Marion F; Hoffmann, Tammy C; Brady, Marian; Dean, Catherine M; Eng, Janice J; Farrin, Amanda J; Felix, Cynthia; Forster, Anne; Langhorne, Peter; Lynch, Elizabeth A; Radford, Kathryn A; Sunnerhagen, Katharina S; Watkins, Caroline L.

In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 10-11, 12.12.2017, p. 877-884.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improving the development, monitoring and reporting of stroke rehabilitation research: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable

AU - Walker, Marion F

AU - Hoffmann, Tammy C

AU - Brady, Marian

AU - Dean, Catherine M

AU - Eng, Janice J

AU - Farrin, Amanda J

AU - Felix, Cynthia

AU - Forster, Anne

AU - Langhorne, Peter

AU - Lynch, Elizabeth A

AU - Radford, Kathryn A

AU - Sunnerhagen, Katharina S

AU - Watkins, Caroline L.

N1 - Acceptance date requested - author noted around same time as 25328494 (23-3-17). For this record, used the last date in the month. ET 18/4/19 Dual publication with International Journal of Stroke Note from the journal website: *This article was first published in International Journal of Stroke 2017, Volume 11, Issue 5, pages 472–479. Checked with author - ok to use AAM used for the other record ET 25328494 AAM: no embargo Available compliantly in Glasgow - Enlighten team confirmed that deposit and access date both 11/8/17, email in SAN. ET 29/10/19

PY - 2017/12/12

Y1 - 2017/12/12

N2 - Recent reviews have demonstrated that the quality of stroke rehabilitation research has continued to improve over the last four decades but despite this progress, there are still many barriers in moving the field forward. Rigorous development, monitoring and complete reporting of interventions in stroke trials are essential in providing rehabilitation evidence that is robust, meaningful and implementable. An international partnership of stroke rehabilitation experts committed to develop consensus-based core recommendations with a remit of addressing the issues identified as limiting stroke rehabilitation research in the areas of developing, monitoring and reporting stroke rehabilitation interventions. Work exploring each of the three areas took place via multiple teleconferences and a two-day meeting in Philadelphia in May 2016. A total of 15 recommendations were made. To validate the need for the recommendations, the group reviewed all stroke rehabilitation trials published in 2015 (n=182 papers). Our review highlighted that the majority of publications did not clearly describe how interventions were developed or monitored during the trial. In particular, under-reporting of the theoretical rationale for the intervention and the components of the intervention call into question many interventions that have been evaluated for efficacy. More trials were found to have addressed the reporting of interventions recommendations than those related to development or monitoring. Nonetheless, the majority of reporting recommendations were still not adequately described. To progress the field of stroke rehabilitation research and to ensure stroke patients receive optimal evidence-based clinical care, we urge the research community to endorse and adopt our recommendations.

AB - Recent reviews have demonstrated that the quality of stroke rehabilitation research has continued to improve over the last four decades but despite this progress, there are still many barriers in moving the field forward. Rigorous development, monitoring and complete reporting of interventions in stroke trials are essential in providing rehabilitation evidence that is robust, meaningful and implementable. An international partnership of stroke rehabilitation experts committed to develop consensus-based core recommendations with a remit of addressing the issues identified as limiting stroke rehabilitation research in the areas of developing, monitoring and reporting stroke rehabilitation interventions. Work exploring each of the three areas took place via multiple teleconferences and a two-day meeting in Philadelphia in May 2016. A total of 15 recommendations were made. To validate the need for the recommendations, the group reviewed all stroke rehabilitation trials published in 2015 (n=182 papers). Our review highlighted that the majority of publications did not clearly describe how interventions were developed or monitored during the trial. In particular, under-reporting of the theoretical rationale for the intervention and the components of the intervention call into question many interventions that have been evaluated for efficacy. More trials were found to have addressed the reporting of interventions recommendations than those related to development or monitoring. Nonetheless, the majority of reporting recommendations were still not adequately described. To progress the field of stroke rehabilitation research and to ensure stroke patients receive optimal evidence-based clinical care, we urge the research community to endorse and adopt our recommendations.

KW - stroke rehabilitation research

KW - Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable

U2 - 10.1177/1545968317732686

DO - 10.1177/1545968317732686

M3 - Article

VL - 10-11

SP - 877

EP - 884

JO - Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

JF - Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

SN - 1545-9683

ER -