Immunity, biopolitics and pandemics: public and individual responses to the threat to life

Mark Davis, Paul Flowers, Davina Lohm, Emily Waller, Niamh Stephenson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines discourse on immunity in general public engagements with pandemic influenza in light of critical theory on immuno-politics and bodily integrity. Interview and focus group discussions on influenza with members of the general public reveal that despite endorsement of government advice on how to avoid infection, influenza is seen as, ultimately, unavoidable. In place of prevention, members of the general public speak of immunity as the means of coping with influenza infection. Such talk on corporeal life under microbial threat is informed by self/not-self, network and ‘choice’ immunity and therefore makes considerable allowance for cosmopolitan traffic with others, microbes, ‘dirt’ and immune-boosting consumer products. The immuno-political orientation of members of the general public, therefore, appears to trend towards a productive cosmopolitanism that constrasts with more orthodox bioscientific and governmental approaches to pandemic influenza. We reflect on the implications of the immuno-cosmopolitanism of everyday life for the advent of global public health emergency and for biopolitical rule in general.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBody and Society
Early online date13 Mar 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2015

Fingerprint

immunity
Pandemics
Human Influenza
contagious disease
Immunity
threat
cosmopolitanism
critical theory
political attitude
Politics
Infection
Focus Groups
group discussion
everyday life
integrity
coping
Emergencies
Public Health
public health
traffic

Keywords

  • biopolitics
  • immunity
  • pandemics
  • bodily integrity
  • biovalue

Cite this

Davis, Mark ; Flowers, Paul ; Lohm, Davina ; Waller, Emily ; Stephenson, Niamh. / Immunity, biopolitics and pandemics: public and individual responses to the threat to life. In: Body and Society. 2015.
@article{438c8b0993f94d34b0ce2d48d7690bb1,
title = "Immunity, biopolitics and pandemics: public and individual responses to the threat to life",
abstract = "This article examines discourse on immunity in general public engagements with pandemic influenza in light of critical theory on immuno-politics and bodily integrity. Interview and focus group discussions on influenza with members of the general public reveal that despite endorsement of government advice on how to avoid infection, influenza is seen as, ultimately, unavoidable. In place of prevention, members of the general public speak of immunity as the means of coping with influenza infection. Such talk on corporeal life under microbial threat is informed by self/not-self, network and ‘choice’ immunity and therefore makes considerable allowance for cosmopolitan traffic with others, microbes, ‘dirt’ and immune-boosting consumer products. The immuno-political orientation of members of the general public, therefore, appears to trend towards a productive cosmopolitanism that constrasts with more orthodox bioscientific and governmental approaches to pandemic influenza. We reflect on the implications of the immuno-cosmopolitanism of everyday life for the advent of global public health emergency and for biopolitical rule in general.",
keywords = "biopolitics, immunity, pandemics , bodily integrity, biovalue",
author = "Mark Davis and Paul Flowers and Davina Lohm and Emily Waller and Niamh Stephenson",
note = "in press 26-1-15 check back for publication status ET HH:29.09.15: an article has been published but title different to this record.However, the abstract is the same. Check back 05.10.15. Contact author. HH:05.10.15, author emailed, awaiting response. Response received.",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/1357034X14556155",
language = "English",
journal = "Body and Society",
issn = "1357-034X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",

}

Immunity, biopolitics and pandemics: public and individual responses to the threat to life. / Davis, Mark; Flowers, Paul; Lohm, Davina; Waller, Emily; Stephenson, Niamh.

In: Body and Society, 03.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Immunity, biopolitics and pandemics: public and individual responses to the threat to life

AU - Davis, Mark

AU - Flowers, Paul

AU - Lohm, Davina

AU - Waller, Emily

AU - Stephenson, Niamh

N1 - in press 26-1-15 check back for publication status ET HH:29.09.15: an article has been published but title different to this record.However, the abstract is the same. Check back 05.10.15. Contact author. HH:05.10.15, author emailed, awaiting response. Response received.

PY - 2015/3

Y1 - 2015/3

N2 - This article examines discourse on immunity in general public engagements with pandemic influenza in light of critical theory on immuno-politics and bodily integrity. Interview and focus group discussions on influenza with members of the general public reveal that despite endorsement of government advice on how to avoid infection, influenza is seen as, ultimately, unavoidable. In place of prevention, members of the general public speak of immunity as the means of coping with influenza infection. Such talk on corporeal life under microbial threat is informed by self/not-self, network and ‘choice’ immunity and therefore makes considerable allowance for cosmopolitan traffic with others, microbes, ‘dirt’ and immune-boosting consumer products. The immuno-political orientation of members of the general public, therefore, appears to trend towards a productive cosmopolitanism that constrasts with more orthodox bioscientific and governmental approaches to pandemic influenza. We reflect on the implications of the immuno-cosmopolitanism of everyday life for the advent of global public health emergency and for biopolitical rule in general.

AB - This article examines discourse on immunity in general public engagements with pandemic influenza in light of critical theory on immuno-politics and bodily integrity. Interview and focus group discussions on influenza with members of the general public reveal that despite endorsement of government advice on how to avoid infection, influenza is seen as, ultimately, unavoidable. In place of prevention, members of the general public speak of immunity as the means of coping with influenza infection. Such talk on corporeal life under microbial threat is informed by self/not-self, network and ‘choice’ immunity and therefore makes considerable allowance for cosmopolitan traffic with others, microbes, ‘dirt’ and immune-boosting consumer products. The immuno-political orientation of members of the general public, therefore, appears to trend towards a productive cosmopolitanism that constrasts with more orthodox bioscientific and governmental approaches to pandemic influenza. We reflect on the implications of the immuno-cosmopolitanism of everyday life for the advent of global public health emergency and for biopolitical rule in general.

KW - biopolitics

KW - immunity

KW - pandemics

KW - bodily integrity

KW - biovalue

U2 - 10.1177/1357034X14556155

DO - 10.1177/1357034X14556155

M3 - Article

JO - Body and Society

JF - Body and Society

SN - 1357-034X

ER -