Immunity, biopolitics and pandemics: public and individual responses to the threat to life

Mark Davis, Paul Flowers, Davina Lohm, Emily Waller, Niamh Stephenson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article examines discourse on immunity in general public engagements with pandemic influenza in light of critical theory on immuno-politics and bodily integrity. Interview and focus group discussions on influenza with members of the general public reveal that despite endorsement of government advice on how to avoid infection, influenza is seen as, ultimately, unavoidable. In place of prevention, members of the general public speak of immunity as the means of coping with influenza infection. Such talk on corporeal life under microbial threat is informed by self/not-self, network and ‘choice’ immunity and therefore makes considerable allowance for cosmopolitan traffic with others, microbes, ‘dirt’ and immune-boosting consumer products. The immuno-political orientation of members of the general public, therefore, appears to trend towards a productive cosmopolitanism that constrasts with more orthodox bioscientific and governmental approaches to pandemic influenza. We reflect on the implications of the immuno-cosmopolitanism of everyday life for the advent of global public health emergency and for biopolitical rule in general.
Original languageEnglish
JournalBody and Society
Early online date13 Mar 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2015

Keywords

  • biopolitics
  • immunity
  • pandemics
  • bodily integrity
  • biovalue

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Immunity, biopolitics and pandemics: public and individual responses to the threat to life'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this