Gender budgeting as a management strategy for gender equality at universities

Andrea Rothe, Birgit Erbe, Werner Fröhlich, Elisabeth Klatzer, Zofia Lapniewska, Monika Mayrhofer, Michaela Neumayr, Michaela Pichlbauer, Malgorzata Tarasiewicz, Johanna Zebisch, Maciej Debski

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

Abstract

Structural disadvantages and the waste of female talent in science have been diagnosed for all states in the European Community by several studies of the European Commission. Women are still faced with a so called glass ceiling which hinders them to get into high positions. This phenomenon is often also described as a “leaky pipeline” as with every step in the scientific career the proportion of women decreases dramatically. Even though women nowadays constitute half of the students or sometimes even more, they do not have a strong voice in decision making processes and curriculum development. This applies for countries with significantly different historical backgrounds or in cases with comparably high numbers of highly qualified women. Additionally, while the proportion of researchers of the total labour force has been increasing, the gender gap regarding work conditions and salaries is widening. Female scientists often work in much more precarious working conditions than men. The proportion of temporary employments in scientific organisations has a clear effect on the proportion of women working in these organisations: the more temporary jobs in the institutions, the higher the proportion of women.

Parallel to this annoying situation Gender Mainstreaming has become an important issue in the debate on reforms for the higher education sector during the last years of the former millennium. Thus the European Commission called upon the member states to implement and intensify gender equality measures and the Commission insisted on a gender action plan as an obligatory request for an application in the 6th Framework Programme on Research and Technological Development. One request was the development of Gender Mainstreaming instruments for the scientific field and another was the implementation of a gender watch system.

The trans-national EU-Project “Gender Budgeting as an instrument for managing scientific organisations to promote equal opportunities for women and men – with the example of universities” is embedded in this context. The question this project focused on is: how can Gender Budgeting be applied as a powerful instrument in the budgeting policy of an organisation? The intention is to show which dimensions and which phases of the budgeting process have to be considered. Furthermore, some basic steps for a systematic integration of gender issues into the budgeting process were developed.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationMünchen
Number of pages134
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

equality
university
gender
management
gender mainstreaming
proportion of women
European Commission
female scientist
temporary employment
equal opportunity
decision making process
action plan
curriculum development
technical development
working conditions
salary
labor force
European Community
EU
career

Keywords

  • gender budgetig
  • universities
  • Poland
  • Germany
  • Austria

Cite this

Rothe, A., Erbe, B., Fröhlich, W., Klatzer, E., Lapniewska, Z., Mayrhofer, M., ... Debski, M. (2008). Gender budgeting as a management strategy for gender equality at universities. München.
Rothe, Andrea ; Erbe, Birgit ; Fröhlich, Werner ; Klatzer, Elisabeth ; Lapniewska, Zofia ; Mayrhofer, Monika ; Neumayr, Michaela ; Pichlbauer, Michaela ; Tarasiewicz, Malgorzata ; Zebisch, Johanna ; Debski, Maciej . / Gender budgeting as a management strategy for gender equality at universities. München, 2008. 134 p.
@book{ada359e874054cfa8344317c02f36ef8,
title = "Gender budgeting as a management strategy for gender equality at universities",
abstract = "Structural disadvantages and the waste of female talent in science have been diagnosed for all states in the European Community by several studies of the European Commission. Women are still faced with a so called glass ceiling which hinders them to get into high positions. This phenomenon is often also described as a “leaky pipeline” as with every step in the scientific career the proportion of women decreases dramatically. Even though women nowadays constitute half of the students or sometimes even more, they do not have a strong voice in decision making processes and curriculum development. This applies for countries with significantly different historical backgrounds or in cases with comparably high numbers of highly qualified women. Additionally, while the proportion of researchers of the total labour force has been increasing, the gender gap regarding work conditions and salaries is widening. Female scientists often work in much more precarious working conditions than men. The proportion of temporary employments in scientific organisations has a clear effect on the proportion of women working in these organisations: the more temporary jobs in the institutions, the higher the proportion of women.Parallel to this annoying situation Gender Mainstreaming has become an important issue in the debate on reforms for the higher education sector during the last years of the former millennium. Thus the European Commission called upon the member states to implement and intensify gender equality measures and the Commission insisted on a gender action plan as an obligatory request for an application in the 6th Framework Programme on Research and Technological Development. One request was the development of Gender Mainstreaming instruments for the scientific field and another was the implementation of a gender watch system. The trans-national EU-Project “Gender Budgeting as an instrument for managing scientific organisations to promote equal opportunities for women and men – with the example of universities” is embedded in this context. The question this project focused on is: how can Gender Budgeting be applied as a powerful instrument in the budgeting policy of an organisation? The intention is to show which dimensions and which phases of the budgeting process have to be considered. Furthermore, some basic steps for a systematic integration of gender issues into the budgeting process were developed.",
keywords = "gender budgetig, universities, Poland, Germany, Austria",
author = "Andrea Rothe and Birgit Erbe and Werner Fr{\"o}hlich and Elisabeth Klatzer and Zofia Lapniewska and Monika Mayrhofer and Michaela Neumayr and Michaela Pichlbauer and Malgorzata Tarasiewicz and Johanna Zebisch and Maciej Debski",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783937120096",

}

Rothe, A, Erbe, B, Fröhlich, W, Klatzer, E, Lapniewska, Z, Mayrhofer, M, Neumayr, M, Pichlbauer, M, Tarasiewicz, M, Zebisch, J & Debski, M 2008, Gender budgeting as a management strategy for gender equality at universities. München.

Gender budgeting as a management strategy for gender equality at universities. / Rothe, Andrea; Erbe, Birgit ; Fröhlich, Werner; Klatzer, Elisabeth; Lapniewska, Zofia; Mayrhofer, Monika; Neumayr, Michaela; Pichlbauer, Michaela; Tarasiewicz, Malgorzata; Zebisch, Johanna; Debski, Maciej .

München, 2008. 134 p.

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

TY - BOOK

T1 - Gender budgeting as a management strategy for gender equality at universities

AU - Rothe, Andrea

AU - Erbe, Birgit

AU - Fröhlich, Werner

AU - Klatzer, Elisabeth

AU - Lapniewska, Zofia

AU - Mayrhofer, Monika

AU - Neumayr, Michaela

AU - Pichlbauer, Michaela

AU - Tarasiewicz, Malgorzata

AU - Zebisch, Johanna

AU - Debski, Maciej

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Structural disadvantages and the waste of female talent in science have been diagnosed for all states in the European Community by several studies of the European Commission. Women are still faced with a so called glass ceiling which hinders them to get into high positions. This phenomenon is often also described as a “leaky pipeline” as with every step in the scientific career the proportion of women decreases dramatically. Even though women nowadays constitute half of the students or sometimes even more, they do not have a strong voice in decision making processes and curriculum development. This applies for countries with significantly different historical backgrounds or in cases with comparably high numbers of highly qualified women. Additionally, while the proportion of researchers of the total labour force has been increasing, the gender gap regarding work conditions and salaries is widening. Female scientists often work in much more precarious working conditions than men. The proportion of temporary employments in scientific organisations has a clear effect on the proportion of women working in these organisations: the more temporary jobs in the institutions, the higher the proportion of women.Parallel to this annoying situation Gender Mainstreaming has become an important issue in the debate on reforms for the higher education sector during the last years of the former millennium. Thus the European Commission called upon the member states to implement and intensify gender equality measures and the Commission insisted on a gender action plan as an obligatory request for an application in the 6th Framework Programme on Research and Technological Development. One request was the development of Gender Mainstreaming instruments for the scientific field and another was the implementation of a gender watch system. The trans-national EU-Project “Gender Budgeting as an instrument for managing scientific organisations to promote equal opportunities for women and men – with the example of universities” is embedded in this context. The question this project focused on is: how can Gender Budgeting be applied as a powerful instrument in the budgeting policy of an organisation? The intention is to show which dimensions and which phases of the budgeting process have to be considered. Furthermore, some basic steps for a systematic integration of gender issues into the budgeting process were developed.

AB - Structural disadvantages and the waste of female talent in science have been diagnosed for all states in the European Community by several studies of the European Commission. Women are still faced with a so called glass ceiling which hinders them to get into high positions. This phenomenon is often also described as a “leaky pipeline” as with every step in the scientific career the proportion of women decreases dramatically. Even though women nowadays constitute half of the students or sometimes even more, they do not have a strong voice in decision making processes and curriculum development. This applies for countries with significantly different historical backgrounds or in cases with comparably high numbers of highly qualified women. Additionally, while the proportion of researchers of the total labour force has been increasing, the gender gap regarding work conditions and salaries is widening. Female scientists often work in much more precarious working conditions than men. The proportion of temporary employments in scientific organisations has a clear effect on the proportion of women working in these organisations: the more temporary jobs in the institutions, the higher the proportion of women.Parallel to this annoying situation Gender Mainstreaming has become an important issue in the debate on reforms for the higher education sector during the last years of the former millennium. Thus the European Commission called upon the member states to implement and intensify gender equality measures and the Commission insisted on a gender action plan as an obligatory request for an application in the 6th Framework Programme on Research and Technological Development. One request was the development of Gender Mainstreaming instruments for the scientific field and another was the implementation of a gender watch system. The trans-national EU-Project “Gender Budgeting as an instrument for managing scientific organisations to promote equal opportunities for women and men – with the example of universities” is embedded in this context. The question this project focused on is: how can Gender Budgeting be applied as a powerful instrument in the budgeting policy of an organisation? The intention is to show which dimensions and which phases of the budgeting process have to be considered. Furthermore, some basic steps for a systematic integration of gender issues into the budgeting process were developed.

KW - gender budgetig

KW - universities

KW - Poland

KW - Germany

KW - Austria

M3 - Commissioned report

SN - 9783937120096

BT - Gender budgeting as a management strategy for gender equality at universities

CY - München

ER -

Rothe A, Erbe B, Fröhlich W, Klatzer E, Lapniewska Z, Mayrhofer M et al. Gender budgeting as a management strategy for gender equality at universities. München, 2008. 134 p.