Further analysis of the predictability of corneal endothelial cell density estimates when polymegethism is present

Michael J. Doughty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose:
To assess variability in endothelial cell density (ECD) estimates when polymegethism (variance in cell areas) is present.

Methods:
Using noncontact specular microscope images of the corneal endothelium, 4 sets of 20 cases were selected, which included 200 cells and had coefficient of variation values of less than 30% (group 1), 31%–40% (group 2), 41%–50% (group 3), and over 50% (group 4). A stepwise analysis was undertaken, 20 cells at a time, of the ECD estimates when using different numbers of cells for the calculations.

Results:
The net differences in ECD estimates when comparing sets of 20 cells with 200 cells were 5.0% ± 3.9%, 8.1% ± 7.3%, 11.3% ± 9.4%, and 14.5% ± 12.4% for groups 1 to 4, respectively. For measures on 100 cells per image, the predicted variances in ECD values were 5.6%, 8.8%, 11.1%, and 13.7% for the 4 groups.

Conclusions:
Higher values of corneal endothelial polymegethism result in predictable increases in the variability (uncertainty) in ECD estimates, thus reducing the “accuracy” of ECD values. There is no obvious utility in assessing more than 100 cells in such endothelia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)973-979
Number of pages7
JournalCornea
Volume36
Issue number8
Early online date13 Jun 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2017

Fingerprint

Endothelial Cells
Cell Count
Corneal Endothelium
Uncertainty
Endothelium

Keywords

  • cornea
  • vision sciences

Cite this

@article{4fc51c2d8f65420dab633c3d5592abf9,
title = "Further analysis of the predictability of corneal endothelial cell density estimates when polymegethism is present",
abstract = "Purpose:To assess variability in endothelial cell density (ECD) estimates when polymegethism (variance in cell areas) is present.Methods:Using noncontact specular microscope images of the corneal endothelium, 4 sets of 20 cases were selected, which included 200 cells and had coefficient of variation values of less than 30{\%} (group 1), 31{\%}–40{\%} (group 2), 41{\%}–50{\%} (group 3), and over 50{\%} (group 4). A stepwise analysis was undertaken, 20 cells at a time, of the ECD estimates when using different numbers of cells for the calculations.Results:The net differences in ECD estimates when comparing sets of 20 cells with 200 cells were 5.0{\%} ± 3.9{\%}, 8.1{\%} ± 7.3{\%}, 11.3{\%} ± 9.4{\%}, and 14.5{\%} ± 12.4{\%} for groups 1 to 4, respectively. For measures on 100 cells per image, the predicted variances in ECD values were 5.6{\%}, 8.8{\%}, 11.1{\%}, and 13.7{\%} for the 4 groups.Conclusions:Higher values of corneal endothelial polymegethism result in predictable increases in the variability (uncertainty) in ECD estimates, thus reducing the “accuracy” of ECD values. There is no obvious utility in assessing more than 100 cells in such endothelia.",
keywords = "cornea, vision sciences",
author = "Doughty, {Michael J.}",
note = "AAM: 12m embargo Acceptance note from author 16-8-17 Not exception result added by library as no response from author and has left GCU. ET 17/10/18",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1097/ICO.0000000000001218",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "973--979",
journal = "Cornea",
issn = "0277-3740",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",
number = "8",

}

Further analysis of the predictability of corneal endothelial cell density estimates when polymegethism is present. / Doughty, Michael J.

In: Cornea, Vol. 36, No. 8, 08.2017, p. 973-979.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Further analysis of the predictability of corneal endothelial cell density estimates when polymegethism is present

AU - Doughty, Michael J.

N1 - AAM: 12m embargo Acceptance note from author 16-8-17 Not exception result added by library as no response from author and has left GCU. ET 17/10/18

PY - 2017/8

Y1 - 2017/8

N2 - Purpose:To assess variability in endothelial cell density (ECD) estimates when polymegethism (variance in cell areas) is present.Methods:Using noncontact specular microscope images of the corneal endothelium, 4 sets of 20 cases were selected, which included 200 cells and had coefficient of variation values of less than 30% (group 1), 31%–40% (group 2), 41%–50% (group 3), and over 50% (group 4). A stepwise analysis was undertaken, 20 cells at a time, of the ECD estimates when using different numbers of cells for the calculations.Results:The net differences in ECD estimates when comparing sets of 20 cells with 200 cells were 5.0% ± 3.9%, 8.1% ± 7.3%, 11.3% ± 9.4%, and 14.5% ± 12.4% for groups 1 to 4, respectively. For measures on 100 cells per image, the predicted variances in ECD values were 5.6%, 8.8%, 11.1%, and 13.7% for the 4 groups.Conclusions:Higher values of corneal endothelial polymegethism result in predictable increases in the variability (uncertainty) in ECD estimates, thus reducing the “accuracy” of ECD values. There is no obvious utility in assessing more than 100 cells in such endothelia.

AB - Purpose:To assess variability in endothelial cell density (ECD) estimates when polymegethism (variance in cell areas) is present.Methods:Using noncontact specular microscope images of the corneal endothelium, 4 sets of 20 cases were selected, which included 200 cells and had coefficient of variation values of less than 30% (group 1), 31%–40% (group 2), 41%–50% (group 3), and over 50% (group 4). A stepwise analysis was undertaken, 20 cells at a time, of the ECD estimates when using different numbers of cells for the calculations.Results:The net differences in ECD estimates when comparing sets of 20 cells with 200 cells were 5.0% ± 3.9%, 8.1% ± 7.3%, 11.3% ± 9.4%, and 14.5% ± 12.4% for groups 1 to 4, respectively. For measures on 100 cells per image, the predicted variances in ECD values were 5.6%, 8.8%, 11.1%, and 13.7% for the 4 groups.Conclusions:Higher values of corneal endothelial polymegethism result in predictable increases in the variability (uncertainty) in ECD estimates, thus reducing the “accuracy” of ECD values. There is no obvious utility in assessing more than 100 cells in such endothelia.

KW - cornea

KW - vision sciences

U2 - 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001218

DO - 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001218

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 973

EP - 979

JO - Cornea

JF - Cornea

SN - 0277-3740

IS - 8

ER -