Feasibility, inter- and intra-rater reliability of physiotherapists measuring prolapse using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system

Diane Stark; Philippa M. Dall; Mohamed Abdel-Fattah; Suzanne Hagen

doi:10.1007/s00192-009-1089-1

Feasibility, inter- and intra-rater reliability of physiotherapists measuring prolapse using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system

Diane Stark, Philippa M. Dall, Mohamed Abdel-Fattah, Suzanne Hagen

SHLS School Office

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

192 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

There is no agreed assessment tool for physiotherapists treating pelvic organ prolapse. This study hypothesised that pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) assessment was a feasible measure for use by physiotherapists and tested inter- and intra-rater agreement. Forty-five women were recruited (median age 59, range 32–87 years). Agreement between gynaecologist and physiotherapist was substantial (weighted kappa¿=¿0.63).

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	651-656
Number of pages	6
Journal	International Urogynecology Journal
Volume	21
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1089-1
Publication status	Published - Jan 2010

Keywords

pelvic organ prolapse
physiotherapy

Documents and Links

10.1007/s00192-009-1089-1

Stark, D. et al (2010) Feasility, inter- and intra-rater reliability
International Urogynecology Journal published by Springer Verlag. Copyright 2010 © Springer
Accepted author manuscript, 91.7 KB

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Feasibility, inter- and intra-rater reliability of physiotherapists measuring prolapse using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{da3555331daf4691b1f219ad92b0d5d0,

title = "Feasibility, inter- and intra-rater reliability of physiotherapists measuring prolapse using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system",

abstract = "There is no agreed assessment tool for physiotherapists treating pelvic organ prolapse. This study hypothesised that pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) assessment was a feasible measure for use by physiotherapists and tested inter- and intra-rater agreement. Forty-five women were recruited (median age 59, range 32–87 years). Agreement between gynaecologist and physiotherapist was substantial (weighted kappa¿=¿0.63).",

keywords = "pelvic organ prolapse, physiotherapy",

author = "Diane Stark and Dall, {Philippa M.} and Mohamed Abdel-Fattah and Suzanne Hagen",

note = "<p>Originally published in: International Urogynecology Journal (2010), 21 (6), pp.651-656. Available online from publisher's website: <a href={"}http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1089-1{"}>http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1089-1</a>. Copyright Springer-Verlag.</p>",

year = "2010",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1007/s00192-009-1089-1",

language = "English",

volume = "21",

pages = "651--656",

journal = "International Urogynecology Journal",

issn = "0937-3462",

publisher = "Springer London",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility, inter- and intra-rater reliability of physiotherapists measuring prolapse using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system

AU - Stark, Diane

AU - Dall, Philippa M.

AU - Abdel-Fattah, Mohamed

AU - Hagen, Suzanne

N1 - <p>Originally published in: International Urogynecology Journal (2010), 21 (6), pp.651-656. Available online from publisher's website: <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1089-1">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-1089-1</a>. Copyright Springer-Verlag.</p>

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - There is no agreed assessment tool for physiotherapists treating pelvic organ prolapse. This study hypothesised that pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) assessment was a feasible measure for use by physiotherapists and tested inter- and intra-rater agreement. Forty-five women were recruited (median age 59, range 32–87 years). Agreement between gynaecologist and physiotherapist was substantial (weighted kappa¿=¿0.63).

AB - There is no agreed assessment tool for physiotherapists treating pelvic organ prolapse. This study hypothesised that pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) assessment was a feasible measure for use by physiotherapists and tested inter- and intra-rater agreement. Forty-five women were recruited (median age 59, range 32–87 years). Agreement between gynaecologist and physiotherapist was substantial (weighted kappa¿=¿0.63).

KW - pelvic organ prolapse

KW - physiotherapy

U2 - 10.1007/s00192-009-1089-1

DO - 10.1007/s00192-009-1089-1

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 651

EP - 656

JO - International Urogynecology Journal

JF - International Urogynecology Journal

SN - 0937-3462

IS - 6

ER -