Family financial management and individual deprivation

Sara Cantillon, Bertrand Maitre, Dorothy Watson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

A core assumption in conventional poverty measurement is that household members share equally in total household income. This paper focuses on heterosexual couple households and asks to what extent male and female partners may derive different benefits from total couple resources. Drawing on the 2010 Irish Survey on Income and Living Conditions module, we examined the couple financial regime, by which we mean which partners received income, whether the income was from work, the extent to which income was contributed for the benefit of other household members and responsibility for decisionmaking. We explored whether the couple’s financial regime was associated with different living standard outcomes for the partners. Among the findings was the beneficial impact of having income from work and of shared responsibility for decision-making. The paper concludes by pointing to some implications for our understanding of power and bargaining in couples.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)461–473
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Family and Economic Issues
Volume37
Issue number3
Early online date8 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2016

Fingerprint

financial management
deprivation
income
responsibility
living standard
living conditions
household income
Financial management
Deprivation
Income
poverty
decision making
resources
Household

Keywords

  • intra-household inequality
  • poverty
  • SILC
  • gender inequality
  • household financial management
  • income pooling

Cite this

Cantillon, Sara ; Maitre, Bertrand ; Watson, Dorothy. / Family financial management and individual deprivation. In: Journal of Family and Economic Issues. 2016 ; Vol. 37, No. 3. pp. 461–473.
@article{8b482948587242e2883471df54dab346,
title = "Family financial management and individual deprivation",
abstract = "A core assumption in conventional poverty measurement is that household members share equally in total household income. This paper focuses on heterosexual couple households and asks to what extent male and female partners may derive different benefits from total couple resources. Drawing on the 2010 Irish Survey on Income and Living Conditions module, we examined the couple financial regime, by which we mean which partners received income, whether the income was from work, the extent to which income was contributed for the benefit of other household members and responsibility for decisionmaking. We explored whether the couple’s financial regime was associated with different living standard outcomes for the partners. Among the findings was the beneficial impact of having income from work and of shared responsibility for decision-making. The paper concludes by pointing to some implications for our understanding of power and bargaining in couples.",
keywords = "intra-household inequality, poverty, SILC, gender inequality, household financial management, income pooling",
author = "Sara Cantillon and Bertrand Maitre and Dorothy Watson",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s10834-015-9466-z",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "461–473",
journal = "Journal of Family and Economic Issues",
issn = "1058-0476",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag",
number = "3",

}

Family financial management and individual deprivation. / Cantillon, Sara; Maitre, Bertrand; Watson, Dorothy.

In: Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Vol. 37, No. 3, 09.2016, p. 461–473.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Family financial management and individual deprivation

AU - Cantillon, Sara

AU - Maitre, Bertrand

AU - Watson, Dorothy

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - A core assumption in conventional poverty measurement is that household members share equally in total household income. This paper focuses on heterosexual couple households and asks to what extent male and female partners may derive different benefits from total couple resources. Drawing on the 2010 Irish Survey on Income and Living Conditions module, we examined the couple financial regime, by which we mean which partners received income, whether the income was from work, the extent to which income was contributed for the benefit of other household members and responsibility for decisionmaking. We explored whether the couple’s financial regime was associated with different living standard outcomes for the partners. Among the findings was the beneficial impact of having income from work and of shared responsibility for decision-making. The paper concludes by pointing to some implications for our understanding of power and bargaining in couples.

AB - A core assumption in conventional poverty measurement is that household members share equally in total household income. This paper focuses on heterosexual couple households and asks to what extent male and female partners may derive different benefits from total couple resources. Drawing on the 2010 Irish Survey on Income and Living Conditions module, we examined the couple financial regime, by which we mean which partners received income, whether the income was from work, the extent to which income was contributed for the benefit of other household members and responsibility for decisionmaking. We explored whether the couple’s financial regime was associated with different living standard outcomes for the partners. Among the findings was the beneficial impact of having income from work and of shared responsibility for decision-making. The paper concludes by pointing to some implications for our understanding of power and bargaining in couples.

KW - intra-household inequality

KW - poverty

KW - SILC

KW - gender inequality

KW - household financial management

KW - income pooling

U2 - 10.1007/s10834-015-9466-z

DO - 10.1007/s10834-015-9466-z

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 461

EP - 473

JO - Journal of Family and Economic Issues

JF - Journal of Family and Economic Issues

SN - 1058-0476

IS - 3

ER -