Evaluation of the NHS Education for Scotland Advanced Practice Succession Planning Development Pathway

Kay Currie, Janette Palmer, John Biggam, David Cochrane, Grace Lindsay

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

Abstract

This study used a mixed methods responsive evaluation design to concurrently evaluate the impact of the pilot advanced practice succession planning development pathway on individuals’ learning, development of advanced practice attributes, service delivery/development and patient outcomes. Direct comparison of the various elements of the pathway demonstrates that the Developmental Needs Assessment Tool was found to be very helpful by the majority of participants, closely followed by critical companion support; action learning sets produced a more varied response, with the majority of participants reporting this process as only ‘somewhat effective’. In identifying the most and least helpful aspects of the pathway, appreciation of NES funding, which was typically used for accredited study, and the value placed on an effective critical companion were ranked most highly, with the considerable challenges of managing time constraints and the disadvantages of on-line action learning sets being highlighted as the top two least helpful factors. Findings strongly endorse the flexible nature and valuable contribution of this
Original languageEnglish
PublisherNHS Education for Scotland
Commissioning bodyNHS Education for Scotland
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

planning practice
development planning
evaluation
learning
education
funding
Values

Keywords

  • advanced practice
  • education research

Cite this

Currie, K., Palmer, J., Biggam, J., Cochrane, D., & Lindsay, G. (2010). Evaluation of the NHS Education for Scotland Advanced Practice Succession Planning Development Pathway. NHS Education for Scotland.
Currie, Kay ; Palmer, Janette ; Biggam, John ; Cochrane, David ; Lindsay, Grace. / Evaluation of the NHS Education for Scotland Advanced Practice Succession Planning Development Pathway. NHS Education for Scotland, 2010.
@book{78768f987b2047b1bd786898aeccda92,
title = "Evaluation of the NHS Education for Scotland Advanced Practice Succession Planning Development Pathway",
abstract = "This study used a mixed methods responsive evaluation design to concurrently evaluate the impact of the pilot advanced practice succession planning development pathway on individuals’ learning, development of advanced practice attributes, service delivery/development and patient outcomes. Direct comparison of the various elements of the pathway demonstrates that the Developmental Needs Assessment Tool was found to be very helpful by the majority of participants, closely followed by critical companion support; action learning sets produced a more varied response, with the majority of participants reporting this process as only ‘somewhat effective’. In identifying the most and least helpful aspects of the pathway, appreciation of NES funding, which was typically used for accredited study, and the value placed on an effective critical companion were ranked most highly, with the considerable challenges of managing time constraints and the disadvantages of on-line action learning sets being highlighted as the top two least helpful factors. Findings strongly endorse the flexible nature and valuable contribution of this",
keywords = "advanced practice, education research",
author = "Kay Currie and Janette Palmer and John Biggam and David Cochrane and Grace Lindsay",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
publisher = "NHS Education for Scotland",

}

Currie, K, Palmer, J, Biggam, J, Cochrane, D & Lindsay, G 2010, Evaluation of the NHS Education for Scotland Advanced Practice Succession Planning Development Pathway. NHS Education for Scotland.

Evaluation of the NHS Education for Scotland Advanced Practice Succession Planning Development Pathway. / Currie, Kay; Palmer, Janette; Biggam, John; Cochrane, David; Lindsay, Grace.

NHS Education for Scotland, 2010.

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned report

TY - BOOK

T1 - Evaluation of the NHS Education for Scotland Advanced Practice Succession Planning Development Pathway

AU - Currie, Kay

AU - Palmer, Janette

AU - Biggam, John

AU - Cochrane, David

AU - Lindsay, Grace

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This study used a mixed methods responsive evaluation design to concurrently evaluate the impact of the pilot advanced practice succession planning development pathway on individuals’ learning, development of advanced practice attributes, service delivery/development and patient outcomes. Direct comparison of the various elements of the pathway demonstrates that the Developmental Needs Assessment Tool was found to be very helpful by the majority of participants, closely followed by critical companion support; action learning sets produced a more varied response, with the majority of participants reporting this process as only ‘somewhat effective’. In identifying the most and least helpful aspects of the pathway, appreciation of NES funding, which was typically used for accredited study, and the value placed on an effective critical companion were ranked most highly, with the considerable challenges of managing time constraints and the disadvantages of on-line action learning sets being highlighted as the top two least helpful factors. Findings strongly endorse the flexible nature and valuable contribution of this

AB - This study used a mixed methods responsive evaluation design to concurrently evaluate the impact of the pilot advanced practice succession planning development pathway on individuals’ learning, development of advanced practice attributes, service delivery/development and patient outcomes. Direct comparison of the various elements of the pathway demonstrates that the Developmental Needs Assessment Tool was found to be very helpful by the majority of participants, closely followed by critical companion support; action learning sets produced a more varied response, with the majority of participants reporting this process as only ‘somewhat effective’. In identifying the most and least helpful aspects of the pathway, appreciation of NES funding, which was typically used for accredited study, and the value placed on an effective critical companion were ranked most highly, with the considerable challenges of managing time constraints and the disadvantages of on-line action learning sets being highlighted as the top two least helpful factors. Findings strongly endorse the flexible nature and valuable contribution of this

KW - advanced practice

KW - education research

M3 - Commissioned report

BT - Evaluation of the NHS Education for Scotland Advanced Practice Succession Planning Development Pathway

PB - NHS Education for Scotland

ER -

Currie K, Palmer J, Biggam J, Cochrane D, Lindsay G. Evaluation of the NHS Education for Scotland Advanced Practice Succession Planning Development Pathway. NHS Education for Scotland, 2010.