Evaluation of student engagement with peer feedback based on student generated MCQs

Jim Devon; James Paterson; David Moffat; June McCrae

Evaluation of student engagement with peer feedback based on student generated MCQs

Jim Devon, James Paterson, David Moffat, June McCrae

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

103 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper, we describe the usage patterns found on four different modules and analyse the detailed outcomes of two case studies based around the usage of the PeerWise system which encourages students to create multiple choice questions (MCQs) for their peers and allows them to evaluate and write comments on MCQs written by their peers.

Original language	English
Article number	3
Pages (from-to)	27-37
Number of pages	10
Journal	Italics
Volume	11
Issue number	1
Publication status	Published - Jun 2012

Keywords

student engagement
student pedagogy
peer supported feedback
PeerWise system

Documents and Links

Evaluation of student engagement, Devon et al. 2012
Published by Higher Education Academy
Final published version, 166 KB

http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/subjects/ics/ITALICS_journal_Jun2012

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of student engagement with peer feedback based on student generated MCQs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Devon, J., Paterson, J., Moffat, D., & McCrae, J. (2012). Evaluation of student engagement with peer feedback based on student generated MCQs. Italics, 11(1), 27-37. [3]. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/subjects/ics/ITALICS_journal_Jun2012

@article{c6dc37bcbbfd4020a930476c130c4c7a,

title = "Evaluation of student engagement with peer feedback based on student generated MCQs",

abstract = "In this paper, we describe the usage patterns found on four different modules and analyse the detailed outcomes of two case studies based around the usage of the PeerWise system which encourages students to create multiple choice questions (MCQs) for their peers and allows them to evaluate and write comments on MCQs written by their peers.",

keywords = "student engagement, student pedagogy, peer supported feedback, PeerWise system",

author = "Jim Devon and James Paterson and David Moffat and June McCrae",

note = "Checked publisher copyright from HEA, ok to show in IR, OA journal. ET 8-2-13",

year = "2012",

month = jun,

language = "English",

volume = "11",

pages = "27--37",

journal = "Italics",

issn = "1473-7507",

publisher = "Taylor & Francis Group",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of student engagement with peer feedback based on student generated MCQs

AU - Devon, Jim

AU - Paterson, James

AU - Moffat, David

AU - McCrae, June

N1 - Checked publisher copyright from HEA, ok to show in IR, OA journal. ET 8-2-13

PY - 2012/6

Y1 - 2012/6

N2 - In this paper, we describe the usage patterns found on four different modules and analyse the detailed outcomes of two case studies based around the usage of the PeerWise system which encourages students to create multiple choice questions (MCQs) for their peers and allows them to evaluate and write comments on MCQs written by their peers.

AB - In this paper, we describe the usage patterns found on four different modules and analyse the detailed outcomes of two case studies based around the usage of the PeerWise system which encourages students to create multiple choice questions (MCQs) for their peers and allows them to evaluate and write comments on MCQs written by their peers.

KW - student engagement

KW - student pedagogy

KW - peer supported feedback

KW - PeerWise system

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 27

EP - 37

JO - Italics

JF - Italics

SN - 1473-7507

IS - 1

M1 - 3

ER -