Evaluating emergency nurse practitioner services: a randomised controlled trial

Mark Cooper, Grace M. Lindsay, Sue Kinn, Ian J. Swann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Emergency Nurse Practitioners (ENP) are increasingly managing minor injuries in Accident and Emergency departments across the United Kingdom. This study aimed to develop methods and tools that could be used to measure the quality of ENP-led care. These tools were then tested in a randomized controlled trial. A convenience sample of 199 eligible patients, over 16 years old, and with specific minor injuries was randomized either to ENP-led care ( n = 99) or Senior House Officer (SHO)-led care ( n = 100) and were diagnosed, treated, referred or discharged by this lead clinician. Following treatment, patients were asked to complete a patient satisfaction questionnaire related to the consultation. Clinical documentation was assessed using a ‘Documentation Audit Tool’. A follow-up questionnaire was sent to all patients at 1 month. Return visits to the department and missed injuries were monitored. The study was sufficiently large to demonstrate higher levels of patient satisfaction and clinical documentation quality with ENP-led than SHO-led care. A larger study involving 769 patients in each arm would be required to detect a 2% difference in missed injury rates. The methods and tools used in this trial could be used in Accident and Emergency departments to measure the quality of ENP-led care.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Advanced Nursing
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2002

Fingerprint

Nurse Practitioners
Emergencies
Randomized Controlled Trials
Documentation
Wounds and Injuries
Patient Satisfaction
Hospital Emergency Service
Referral and Consultation

Keywords

  • emrgency nurse services
  • accident and emergency
  • minor injuries

Cite this

Cooper, Mark ; Lindsay, Grace M. ; Kinn, Sue ; Swann, Ian J. / Evaluating emergency nurse practitioner services: a randomised controlled trial. In: Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2002.
@article{83bb30a1ef10498c8ae94319d8bd125c,
title = "Evaluating emergency nurse practitioner services: a randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "Emergency Nurse Practitioners (ENP) are increasingly managing minor injuries in Accident and Emergency departments across the United Kingdom. This study aimed to develop methods and tools that could be used to measure the quality of ENP-led care. These tools were then tested in a randomized controlled trial. A convenience sample of 199 eligible patients, over 16 years old, and with specific minor injuries was randomized either to ENP-led care ( n = 99) or Senior House Officer (SHO)-led care ( n = 100) and were diagnosed, treated, referred or discharged by this lead clinician. Following treatment, patients were asked to complete a patient satisfaction questionnaire related to the consultation. Clinical documentation was assessed using a ‘Documentation Audit Tool’. A follow-up questionnaire was sent to all patients at 1 month. Return visits to the department and missed injuries were monitored. The study was sufficiently large to demonstrate higher levels of patient satisfaction and clinical documentation quality with ENP-led than SHO-led care. A larger study involving 769 patients in each arm would be required to detect a 2{\%} difference in missed injury rates. The methods and tools used in this trial could be used in Accident and Emergency departments to measure the quality of ENP-led care.",
keywords = "emrgency nurse services, accident and emergency, minor injuries",
author = "Mark Cooper and Lindsay, {Grace M.} and Sue Kinn and Swann, {Ian J.}",
note = "Originally published in: Journal of Advanced Nursing (2002), 40 (6), pp.721-730.",
year = "2002",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02431.x",
language = "English",
journal = "Journal of Advanced Nursing",
issn = "0309-2402",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",

}

Evaluating emergency nurse practitioner services: a randomised controlled trial. / Cooper, Mark; Lindsay, Grace M.; Kinn, Sue; Swann, Ian J.

In: Journal of Advanced Nursing, 01.12.2002.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating emergency nurse practitioner services: a randomised controlled trial

AU - Cooper, Mark

AU - Lindsay, Grace M.

AU - Kinn, Sue

AU - Swann, Ian J.

N1 - Originally published in: Journal of Advanced Nursing (2002), 40 (6), pp.721-730.

PY - 2002/12/1

Y1 - 2002/12/1

N2 - Emergency Nurse Practitioners (ENP) are increasingly managing minor injuries in Accident and Emergency departments across the United Kingdom. This study aimed to develop methods and tools that could be used to measure the quality of ENP-led care. These tools were then tested in a randomized controlled trial. A convenience sample of 199 eligible patients, over 16 years old, and with specific minor injuries was randomized either to ENP-led care ( n = 99) or Senior House Officer (SHO)-led care ( n = 100) and were diagnosed, treated, referred or discharged by this lead clinician. Following treatment, patients were asked to complete a patient satisfaction questionnaire related to the consultation. Clinical documentation was assessed using a ‘Documentation Audit Tool’. A follow-up questionnaire was sent to all patients at 1 month. Return visits to the department and missed injuries were monitored. The study was sufficiently large to demonstrate higher levels of patient satisfaction and clinical documentation quality with ENP-led than SHO-led care. A larger study involving 769 patients in each arm would be required to detect a 2% difference in missed injury rates. The methods and tools used in this trial could be used in Accident and Emergency departments to measure the quality of ENP-led care.

AB - Emergency Nurse Practitioners (ENP) are increasingly managing minor injuries in Accident and Emergency departments across the United Kingdom. This study aimed to develop methods and tools that could be used to measure the quality of ENP-led care. These tools were then tested in a randomized controlled trial. A convenience sample of 199 eligible patients, over 16 years old, and with specific minor injuries was randomized either to ENP-led care ( n = 99) or Senior House Officer (SHO)-led care ( n = 100) and were diagnosed, treated, referred or discharged by this lead clinician. Following treatment, patients were asked to complete a patient satisfaction questionnaire related to the consultation. Clinical documentation was assessed using a ‘Documentation Audit Tool’. A follow-up questionnaire was sent to all patients at 1 month. Return visits to the department and missed injuries were monitored. The study was sufficiently large to demonstrate higher levels of patient satisfaction and clinical documentation quality with ENP-led than SHO-led care. A larger study involving 769 patients in each arm would be required to detect a 2% difference in missed injury rates. The methods and tools used in this trial could be used in Accident and Emergency departments to measure the quality of ENP-led care.

KW - emrgency nurse services

KW - accident and emergency

KW - minor injuries

U2 - 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02431.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02431.x

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Advanced Nursing

JF - Journal of Advanced Nursing

SN - 0309-2402

ER -