Encouraging practitioners in infection prevention and control to publish: a cross-sectional survey

Lynn Melone, Lesley Price, Jennie Wilson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

58 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of this cross-sectional survey was to determine the views of infection prevention and control practitioners (IPCPs) on publishing research. A convenience sample was obtained by approaching delegates at the 2015 Infection Prevention Society conference and data were captured via a hand-held electronic device. Of the 79 respondents, most (83%) read the Journal of Infection Prevention (JIP) and found it useful for informing their practice (72%). However, most (91%) had never published in JIP, and less than half (40%) published elsewhere. The main barrier to publication was not having work suitable for publication (38%). Support (37%), training in writing for publication (10%) and time (9%) were considered to be important facilitators in encouraging respondents to publish.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)289-292
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Infection Prevention
Volume17
Issue number6
Early online date12 Sep 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2016

Fingerprint

Infection Control
Publications
Cross-Sectional Studies
Infection Control Practitioners
Infection
Training Support
Hand
Equipment and Supplies
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • infection prevention
  • research writing skills
  • barriers

Cite this

@article{c68ae5d409c144cca354ac3dede8170b,
title = "Encouraging practitioners in infection prevention and control to publish: a cross-sectional survey",
abstract = "The aim of this cross-sectional survey was to determine the views of infection prevention and control practitioners (IPCPs) on publishing research. A convenience sample was obtained by approaching delegates at the 2015 Infection Prevention Society conference and data were captured via a hand-held electronic device. Of the 79 respondents, most (83{\%}) read the Journal of Infection Prevention (JIP) and found it useful for informing their practice (72{\%}). However, most (91{\%}) had never published in JIP, and less than half (40{\%}) published elsewhere. The main barrier to publication was not having work suitable for publication (38{\%}). Support (37{\%}), training in writing for publication (10{\%}) and time (9{\%}) were considered to be important facilitators in encouraging respondents to publish.",
keywords = "infection prevention, research writing skills, barriers",
author = "Lynn Melone and Lesley Price and Jennie Wilson",
note = "Accepted: 2/7/16 Online pub: 12/9/16 AAM: uploaded (Word) 20/7/16; Library replaced with PDF version 19/9/16 No embargo required by publisher (SAGE), meets access requirement",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1757177416663838",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "289--292",
journal = "Journal of Infection Prevention",
issn = "1757-1774",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "6",

}

Encouraging practitioners in infection prevention and control to publish: a cross-sectional survey. / Melone, Lynn; Price, Lesley; Wilson, Jennie.

In: Journal of Infection Prevention, Vol. 17, No. 6, 01.11.2016, p. 289-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Encouraging practitioners in infection prevention and control to publish: a cross-sectional survey

AU - Melone, Lynn

AU - Price, Lesley

AU - Wilson, Jennie

N1 - Accepted: 2/7/16 Online pub: 12/9/16 AAM: uploaded (Word) 20/7/16; Library replaced with PDF version 19/9/16 No embargo required by publisher (SAGE), meets access requirement

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - The aim of this cross-sectional survey was to determine the views of infection prevention and control practitioners (IPCPs) on publishing research. A convenience sample was obtained by approaching delegates at the 2015 Infection Prevention Society conference and data were captured via a hand-held electronic device. Of the 79 respondents, most (83%) read the Journal of Infection Prevention (JIP) and found it useful for informing their practice (72%). However, most (91%) had never published in JIP, and less than half (40%) published elsewhere. The main barrier to publication was not having work suitable for publication (38%). Support (37%), training in writing for publication (10%) and time (9%) were considered to be important facilitators in encouraging respondents to publish.

AB - The aim of this cross-sectional survey was to determine the views of infection prevention and control practitioners (IPCPs) on publishing research. A convenience sample was obtained by approaching delegates at the 2015 Infection Prevention Society conference and data were captured via a hand-held electronic device. Of the 79 respondents, most (83%) read the Journal of Infection Prevention (JIP) and found it useful for informing their practice (72%). However, most (91%) had never published in JIP, and less than half (40%) published elsewhere. The main barrier to publication was not having work suitable for publication (38%). Support (37%), training in writing for publication (10%) and time (9%) were considered to be important facilitators in encouraging respondents to publish.

KW - infection prevention

KW - research writing skills

KW - barriers

U2 - 10.1177/1757177416663838

DO - 10.1177/1757177416663838

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 289

EP - 292

JO - Journal of Infection Prevention

JF - Journal of Infection Prevention

SN - 1757-1774

IS - 6

ER -