Effectiveness of motivational interviewing on adult behaviour change in health and social care settings: a systematic review of reviews

Helen Frost*, Pauline Campbell, Margaret Maxwell, Ronan E. O'Carroll, Stephan U. Dombrowski, Brian Williams, Helen Cheyne, Emma Coles, Alex Pollock

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

216 Citations (Scopus)
853 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background:The challenge of addressing unhealthy lifestyle choice is of global concern. Motivational Interviewing has been widely implemented to help people change their behaviour, but it is unclear for whom it is most beneficial. This overview aims to appraise and synthesise the review evidence for the effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing on health behaviour of adults in health and social care settings.Methods:A systematic review of reviews. Methods were pre-specified and documented in a protocol (PROSPERO–CRD42016049278). We systematically searched 7 electronic databases: CDSR; DARE; PROSPERO; MEDLINE; CINAHL; AMED and PsycINFO from 2000 to May 2018. Two reviewers applied pre-defined selection criteria, extracted data using TIDIER guidelines and assessed methodological quality using the ROBIS tool. We used GRADE criteria to rate the strength of the evidence for reviews including meta-analyses.Findings:Searches identified 5222 records. One hundred and four reviews, including 39 meta-analyses met the inclusion criteria. Most meta-analysis evidence was graded as low or very low (128/155). Moderate quality evidence for mainly short term (<6 months) statistically significant small beneficial effects of Motivational Interviewing were found in 11 of 155 (7%) of meta-analysis comparisons. These outcomes include reducing binge drinking, frequency and quantity of alcohol consumption, substance abuse in people with dependency or addiction, and increasing physical activity participation.Conclusions:We have created a comprehensive map of reviews relating to Motivational Interviewing to signpost stakeholders to the best available evidence. More high quality research is needed to be confident about the effectiveness of Motivational Interviewing. We identified a large volume of low quality evidence and many areas of overlapping research. To avoid research waste, it is vital for researchers to be aware of existing research, and the implications arising from that research. In the case of Motivational Interviewing issues relating to monitoring and reporting fidelity of interventions need to be addressed.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0204890
Pages (from-to)e0204890
Number of pages39
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume13
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Oct 2018

Keywords

  • adult behaviour
  • health and social care
  • unhealthy lifestyle choice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effectiveness of motivational interviewing on adult behaviour change in health and social care settings: a systematic review of reviews'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this