Abstract
Economic evaluation is the comparative analysis of alternative health care interventions in terms of their relative costs (resource use) and effectiveness (health effects). High-quality studies of economic evaluation have been increasingly published in medical journals and read by clinicians, although publication of these studies in nephrology journals has been a more recent phenomenon. This article shows how the basic principles of economics can be applied to health care through the use of economic evaluation. Different types of economic evaluation are discussed, and pitfalls common to such studies are identified. A simple framework is introduced that can be used to interpret the results of economic evaluations. Using this framework, selected therapies for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are categorized to highlight therapies that are very efficient, encourage their use, and draw attention to therapies in current use that are less effective and more expensive (ie, less efficient) than alternative therapy. Using examples pertinent to care of the patient with ESRD, we show how economic evaluation can be used to link medical outcomes, quality of life, and costs in a common index for multiple therapies with disparate outcome measures. This article highlights the need for clinical studies and economic evaluations of therapies in ESRD for which the effects of the therapy on health outcomes and/or costs are unknown.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 12-28 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | American Journal of Kidney Diseases |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2000 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Cost analysis
- Cost utility
- Cost-effectiveness
- Dialysis
- Economic evaluation
- End-stage renal disease (ESRD)
- Health economics
- Kidney failure
- Review
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Nephrology