Abstract
This study by Brady et al. has an extremely laudable aim of trying to gain a deep understanding of the experience of a person with dysarthria interacting with rehabilitation services and managing their condition day-to-day in their own environment. Their stated method of using a ‘constant comparative approach (grounded theory)’ would be an excellent approach to exploring the topic. Unfortunately I cannot see that their methodology bears much resemblance to grounded theory or constant comparison at all.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 382-383 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Clinical Rehabilitation |
Volume | 26 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2012 |
Keywords
- dysarthria
- stroke rehabilitation
- grounded theory