Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 287-300 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Critical and Radical Social Work |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 12 Sep 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2017 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
'Downpressor man': securitisation, safeguarding and social work. / McKendrick, David; Finch, Jo.
In: Critical and Radical Social Work, Vol. 5, No. 3, 11.2017, p. 287-300.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - 'Downpressor man': securitisation, safeguarding and social work
AU - McKendrick, David
AU - Finch, Jo
N1 - Acceptance from VoR (attached to record) AAM requested x 2 (4/12/18 and 8/2/19) ET Applied 'no exception' as no AAM available. ET 8/11/19 Found AAM in other repository - uploaded and contacted UEL for deposit and access dates. ET 17/12/19 ^UEL confirmed compliant dates. Email in SAN. ET 17/12/19
PY - 2017/11
Y1 - 2017/11
N2 - The Counter Terrorism and Security Act came into force in July 2015 in the UK. This places a statutory duty on many front-line organisations, for example, schools, social services and prisons, to work within the PREVENT agenda, a policy arising from Britain's overall counterterrorism policy, CONTEST. We argue that PREVENT is representative of increasingly securitised social policies that serve to: first, view people within particular individualised neoliberal discourses and thin narratives; and, second, coerce the profession of social work into hitherto unknown areas, namely, national security and counterterrorism. We note the unapologetic linkage of traditional forms of what we term here 'welfare safeguarding', customarily the domain of social work, with what we term 'security safeguarding'. If the profession of social work in the UK, and we suspect other Western regimes, wishes to avoid becoming a profession of 'downpressor men', the uncritical incursion into issues of national security and counterterrorism must be highlighted.
AB - The Counter Terrorism and Security Act came into force in July 2015 in the UK. This places a statutory duty on many front-line organisations, for example, schools, social services and prisons, to work within the PREVENT agenda, a policy arising from Britain's overall counterterrorism policy, CONTEST. We argue that PREVENT is representative of increasingly securitised social policies that serve to: first, view people within particular individualised neoliberal discourses and thin narratives; and, second, coerce the profession of social work into hitherto unknown areas, namely, national security and counterterrorism. We note the unapologetic linkage of traditional forms of what we term here 'welfare safeguarding', customarily the domain of social work, with what we term 'security safeguarding'. If the profession of social work in the UK, and we suspect other Western regimes, wishes to avoid becoming a profession of 'downpressor men', the uncritical incursion into issues of national security and counterterrorism must be highlighted.
U2 - 10.1332/204986017X15029697482460
DO - 10.1332/204986017X15029697482460
M3 - Article
VL - 5
SP - 287
EP - 300
IS - 3
ER -