'Downpressor man': securitisation, safeguarding and social work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The Counter Terrorism and Security Act came into force in July 2015 in the UK. This places a statutory duty on many front-line organisations, for example, schools, social services and prisons, to work within the PREVENT agenda, a policy arising from Britain's overall counterterrorism policy, CONTEST. We argue that PREVENT is representative of increasingly securitised social policies that serve to: first, view people within particular individualised neoliberal discourses and thin narratives; and, second, coerce the profession of social work into hitherto unknown areas, namely, national security and counterterrorism. We note the unapologetic linkage of traditional forms of what we term here 'welfare safeguarding', customarily the domain of social work, with what we term 'security safeguarding'. If the profession of social work in the UK, and we suspect other Western regimes, wishes to avoid becoming a profession of 'downpressor men', the uncritical incursion into issues of national security and counterterrorism must be highlighted.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)287-300
Number of pages13
JournalCritical and Radical Social Work
Volume5
Issue number3
Early online date12 Sep 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2017

Fingerprint

social work
profession
national security
mobile social services
correctional institution
terrorism
welfare
act
regime
narrative
discourse
school
Social Policy

Cite this

McKendrick, David ; Finch, Jo. / 'Downpressor man': securitisation, safeguarding and social work. In: Critical and Radical Social Work. 2017 ; Vol. 5, No. 3. pp. 287-300.
@article{986ea2d268f7498096862fc2b02fd63b,
title = "'Downpressor man': securitisation, safeguarding and social work",
abstract = "The Counter Terrorism and Security Act came into force in July 2015 in the UK. This places a statutory duty on many front-line organisations, for example, schools, social services and prisons, to work within the PREVENT agenda, a policy arising from Britain's overall counterterrorism policy, CONTEST. We argue that PREVENT is representative of increasingly securitised social policies that serve to: first, view people within particular individualised neoliberal discourses and thin narratives; and, second, coerce the profession of social work into hitherto unknown areas, namely, national security and counterterrorism. We note the unapologetic linkage of traditional forms of what we term here 'welfare safeguarding', customarily the domain of social work, with what we term 'security safeguarding'. If the profession of social work in the UK, and we suspect other Western regimes, wishes to avoid becoming a profession of 'downpressor men', the uncritical incursion into issues of national security and counterterrorism must be highlighted.",
author = "David McKendrick and Jo Finch",
note = "Acceptance from VoR (attached to record) AAM requested x 2 (4/12/18 and 8/2/19) ET Applied 'no exception' as no AAM available. ET 8/11/19 Found AAM in other repository - uploaded and contacted UEL for deposit and access dates. ET 17/12/19 ^UEL confirmed compliant dates. Email in SAN. ET 17/12/19",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1332/204986017X15029697482460",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "287--300",
number = "3",

}

McKendrick, D & Finch, J 2017, ''Downpressor man': securitisation, safeguarding and social work', Critical and Radical Social Work, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1332/204986017X15029697482460

'Downpressor man': securitisation, safeguarding and social work. / McKendrick, David; Finch, Jo.

In: Critical and Radical Social Work, Vol. 5, No. 3, 11.2017, p. 287-300.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Downpressor man': securitisation, safeguarding and social work

AU - McKendrick, David

AU - Finch, Jo

N1 - Acceptance from VoR (attached to record) AAM requested x 2 (4/12/18 and 8/2/19) ET Applied 'no exception' as no AAM available. ET 8/11/19 Found AAM in other repository - uploaded and contacted UEL for deposit and access dates. ET 17/12/19 ^UEL confirmed compliant dates. Email in SAN. ET 17/12/19

PY - 2017/11

Y1 - 2017/11

N2 - The Counter Terrorism and Security Act came into force in July 2015 in the UK. This places a statutory duty on many front-line organisations, for example, schools, social services and prisons, to work within the PREVENT agenda, a policy arising from Britain's overall counterterrorism policy, CONTEST. We argue that PREVENT is representative of increasingly securitised social policies that serve to: first, view people within particular individualised neoliberal discourses and thin narratives; and, second, coerce the profession of social work into hitherto unknown areas, namely, national security and counterterrorism. We note the unapologetic linkage of traditional forms of what we term here 'welfare safeguarding', customarily the domain of social work, with what we term 'security safeguarding'. If the profession of social work in the UK, and we suspect other Western regimes, wishes to avoid becoming a profession of 'downpressor men', the uncritical incursion into issues of national security and counterterrorism must be highlighted.

AB - The Counter Terrorism and Security Act came into force in July 2015 in the UK. This places a statutory duty on many front-line organisations, for example, schools, social services and prisons, to work within the PREVENT agenda, a policy arising from Britain's overall counterterrorism policy, CONTEST. We argue that PREVENT is representative of increasingly securitised social policies that serve to: first, view people within particular individualised neoliberal discourses and thin narratives; and, second, coerce the profession of social work into hitherto unknown areas, namely, national security and counterterrorism. We note the unapologetic linkage of traditional forms of what we term here 'welfare safeguarding', customarily the domain of social work, with what we term 'security safeguarding'. If the profession of social work in the UK, and we suspect other Western regimes, wishes to avoid becoming a profession of 'downpressor men', the uncritical incursion into issues of national security and counterterrorism must be highlighted.

U2 - 10.1332/204986017X15029697482460

DO - 10.1332/204986017X15029697482460

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 287

EP - 300

IS - 3

ER -