Does informing people who inject drugs of their hepatitis C status influence their injecting behaviour? Analysis of the Networks II study

Esther Aspinall, Amanda Weir, R Sacks-Davis, T Spelman (Translator), Jason Grebely, P Higgs, Sharon Hutchinson, Margaret Hellard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: People who inject drugs (PWID) are at risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV). It is plausible that PWID who receive a diagnosis of HCV will reduce their injecting risk out of concern for their injecting partners, although evidence for this is currently limited. The aim of this study was to investigate whether informing PWID of their HCV diagnosis was associated with a change in injecting behaviour. Methods: Prospective, longitudinal study of PWID recruited from street drug markets across Melbourne, Australia. Interviews and HCV testing were conducted at 3-monthly intervals. The association between receiving a diagnosis of HCV and (i) injecting frequency and (ii) injecting equipment borrowing, was examined using generalized estimating equations (GEE) analysis.Results: Thirty-five individuals received a diagnosis of HCV during the study period. Receiving a diagnosis of HCV was associated with a decrease of 0.35 injections per month (p=0.046) but there was no change in injecting equipment borrowing (p=0.750). Conclusions: A small reduction in injecting frequency was observed in PWID who received a diagnosis of HCV. This finding should be investigated further in larger studies examining a wider range of injecting risk behaviours.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-182
Number of pages4
JournalInternational Journal of Drug Policy
Volume25
Issue number1
Early online date6 Dec 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Keywords

  • Hepatitis C
  • people who inject drugs
  • risk behaviours

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does informing people who inject drugs of their hepatitis C status influence their injecting behaviour? Analysis of the Networks II study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this