Do ends justify means? Feminist economics perspectives on the business case for gender equality in the UK labour market

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper intends to explore a feminist economics perspective on business case arguments for gender equality in the UK labour market, where there are significant inequalities between men and women. Policy discourse on gender equality has moved from one which emphasises ‘equal opportunities’ and notions of fairness and equal treatment to one which focuses on increasing economic efficiency in the wider economy and viewing female employees as a competitive advantage for individual firms. Developments in the policy discourse of gender equality in the labour market have been heavily influenced by mainstream, neoclassical economics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)118
JournalE-Cadernos CES
Volume5
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2009

Fingerprint

Feminist economics
Gender equality
Business case
Labour market
Discourse
Fairness
Equal treatment
Economic efficiency
Competitive advantage
Equal opportunities
Neoclassical economics
Employees

Keywords

  • labour market
  • feminist economics
  • gender equality
  • business case

Cite this

@article{10984b7c086645c3b08958d1a225e8d1,
title = "Do ends justify means? Feminist economics perspectives on the business case for gender equality in the UK labour market",
abstract = "This paper intends to explore a feminist economics perspective on business case arguments for gender equality in the UK labour market, where there are significant inequalities between men and women. Policy discourse on gender equality has moved from one which emphasises ‘equal opportunities’ and notions of fairness and equal treatment to one which focuses on increasing economic efficiency in the wider economy and viewing female employees as a competitive advantage for individual firms. Developments in the policy discourse of gender equality in the labour market have been heavily influenced by mainstream, neoclassical economics.",
keywords = "labour market, feminist economics, gender equality, business case",
author = "Emily Thomson",
note = "FT not available via GCU library ET 20-11-13",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "118",
journal = "E-Cadernos CES",
issn = "1647-0737",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do ends justify means? Feminist economics perspectives on the business case for gender equality in the UK labour market

AU - Thomson, Emily

N1 - FT not available via GCU library ET 20-11-13

PY - 2009/9

Y1 - 2009/9

N2 - This paper intends to explore a feminist economics perspective on business case arguments for gender equality in the UK labour market, where there are significant inequalities between men and women. Policy discourse on gender equality has moved from one which emphasises ‘equal opportunities’ and notions of fairness and equal treatment to one which focuses on increasing economic efficiency in the wider economy and viewing female employees as a competitive advantage for individual firms. Developments in the policy discourse of gender equality in the labour market have been heavily influenced by mainstream, neoclassical economics.

AB - This paper intends to explore a feminist economics perspective on business case arguments for gender equality in the UK labour market, where there are significant inequalities between men and women. Policy discourse on gender equality has moved from one which emphasises ‘equal opportunities’ and notions of fairness and equal treatment to one which focuses on increasing economic efficiency in the wider economy and viewing female employees as a competitive advantage for individual firms. Developments in the policy discourse of gender equality in the labour market have been heavily influenced by mainstream, neoclassical economics.

KW - labour market

KW - feminist economics

KW - gender equality

KW - business case

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 118

JO - E-Cadernos CES

JF - E-Cadernos CES

SN - 1647-0737

ER -