Differential item functioning of a family affluence scale: validation study on data from HBSC 2001/02

Arts & Humanities

• Differential Item Functioning 100%
• Affluence 65%
• Wealth 8%
• Test Bias 7%
• Malta 5%
• Greenland 5%
• Health 5%
• Social Inequality 5%
• Macedonia 4%
• World Health Organization 4%
• Latvia 4%
• Estonia 4%
• Lithuania 4%
• Slovenia 4%
• Israel 4%
• Ukraine 4%
• Croatia 4%
• Finland 4%
• Economics 4%
• Denmark 4%
• Norway 4%
• Belgium 3%
• Switzerland 3%
• Hungary 3%
• Portugal 3%
• Public Health 3%
• Austria 3%
• Sweden 3%
• Greece 3%
• Czech Republic 3%
• Questionnaire 3%
• The Netherlands 3%
• Poland 3%
• Ireland 3%
• Italy 3%
• Canada 3%
• Russia 2%
• Spain 2%
• Germany 2%
• France 2%
• Methodology 1%

Medicine & Life Sciences

• Validation Studies 56%
• Proxy 8%
• Malta 6%
• Economics 6%
• Latvia 6%
• Greenland 5%
• Estonia 5%
• Lithuania 5%
• Slovenia 5%
• Ukraine 5%
• Internationality 5%
• Croatia 5%
• Hungary 4%
• Portugal 4%
• Czech Republic 4%
• Austria 4%
• Greece 4%
• Russia 4%
• Belgium 4%
• Ireland 4%
• Israel 4%
• Poland 4%
• Switzerland 4%
• Finland 4%
• Norway 4%
• Denmark 4%
• Health Behavior 4%
• Sweden 3%
• Health 3%
• Spain 3%
• Netherlands 3%
• Italy 3%
• France 3%
• Canada 3%
• Child 3%
• Linear Models 3%
• Public Health 2%
• Population 1%

Social Sciences

• affluence 64%
• social position 8%
• Malta 5%
• Macedonia 4%
• socioeconomic position 4%
• social indicators 4%
• Latvia 4%
• Lithuania 4%
• Estonia 4%
• linear model 4%
• Slovenia 4%
• Croatia 4%
• health behavior 4%
• Ukraine 3%
• Austria 3%
• Czech Republic 3%
• Hungary 3%
• Belgium 3%
• social inequality 3%
• gender 3%
• Switzerland 3%
• Portugal 3%
• Denmark 3%
• Greece 3%
• WHO 3%
• Ireland 3%
• Finland 3%
• Poland 3%
• health 3%
• Norway 3%
• Sweden 3%
• Israel 3%
• Netherlands 3%
• Italy 3%
• France 3%
• Spain 3%
• Russia 2%
• Federal Republic of Germany 2%
• public health 2%
• Canada 2%
• methodology 2%
• questionnaire 1%
• trend 1%
• economics 1%