TY - JOUR
T1 - Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews
AU - Pollock, Alex
AU - Campbell, Pauline
AU - Struthers, Caroline
AU - Synnot, Anneliese
AU - Nunn, Jack
AU - Hill, Sophie
AU - Goodare, Heather
AU - Morris, Jacqui
AU - Watts, Chris
AU - Morley, Richard
N1 - Article has been provisionally accepted on 23/10/18. Author asked to forward on formal acceptance and record will be prioritised for validation. ET
AAM: SAGE allows AAM to be made open at acceptance.
Update 20/12/18 from AP: author to amend and resubmit - leaving for validation. ET
Author confirmed not yet accepted at 12/3/19 by email; changed status to entry in progress and informed author. ET
Asked author if now accepted ET 19/12/18
Acceptance in SAN
Query to author re AAM - file was uploaded in Dec18, but paper was accepted in March19. ET 17/6/19
^Author provided new version of AAM - uploaded 18/6/19 ET
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - Objectives: Involvement of patients, health professionals, and the wider public (‘stakeholders’) is seen to be beneficial to the quality, relevance and impact of research and may enhance the usefulness and uptake of systematic reviews. However, there is a lack of evidence and resources to guide researchers in how to actively involve stakeholders in systematic reviews. In this paper, we report the development of the ACTIVE framework to describe how stakeholders are involved in systematic reviews. Methods: We developed a framework using methods previously described in the development of conceptual frameworks relating to other areas of public involvement, including: literature searching, data extraction, analysis, and categorization. A draft ACTIVE framework was developed and then refined after presentation at a conference workshop, before being applied to a subset of 32 systematic reviews. Data extracted from these systematic reviews, identified in a systematic scoping review, were categorized against pre-defined constructs, including: who was involved, how stakeholders were recruited, the mode of involvement, at what stage there was involvement and the level of control or influence. Results: The final ACTIVE framework described whether patients, carers and/or families, and/or other stakeholders (including health professionals, health decision makers and funders) were involved. We defined: recruitment as either open or closed; the approach to involvement as either one-time, continuous or combined; and the method of involvement as either direct or indirect. The stage of involvement in reviews was defined using the Cochrane Ecosystem stages of a review. The level of control or influence was defined according to the roles and activities of stakeholders in the review process, and described as the ACTIVE continuum of involvement. Conclusions: The ACTIVE framework provides a structure with which to describe key components of stakeholder involvement within a systematic review, and we have used this to summarize how stakeholders have been involved in a subset of varied systematic reviews. The ACTIVE continuum of involvement provides a new model that uses tasks and roles to detail the level of stakeholder involvement. This work has contributed to the development of learning resources aimed at supporting systematic review authors and editors to involve stakeholders in their systematic reviews. The ACTIVE framework may support the decision-making of systematic review authors in planning how to involve stakeholders in future reviews.
AB - Objectives: Involvement of patients, health professionals, and the wider public (‘stakeholders’) is seen to be beneficial to the quality, relevance and impact of research and may enhance the usefulness and uptake of systematic reviews. However, there is a lack of evidence and resources to guide researchers in how to actively involve stakeholders in systematic reviews. In this paper, we report the development of the ACTIVE framework to describe how stakeholders are involved in systematic reviews. Methods: We developed a framework using methods previously described in the development of conceptual frameworks relating to other areas of public involvement, including: literature searching, data extraction, analysis, and categorization. A draft ACTIVE framework was developed and then refined after presentation at a conference workshop, before being applied to a subset of 32 systematic reviews. Data extracted from these systematic reviews, identified in a systematic scoping review, were categorized against pre-defined constructs, including: who was involved, how stakeholders were recruited, the mode of involvement, at what stage there was involvement and the level of control or influence. Results: The final ACTIVE framework described whether patients, carers and/or families, and/or other stakeholders (including health professionals, health decision makers and funders) were involved. We defined: recruitment as either open or closed; the approach to involvement as either one-time, continuous or combined; and the method of involvement as either direct or indirect. The stage of involvement in reviews was defined using the Cochrane Ecosystem stages of a review. The level of control or influence was defined according to the roles and activities of stakeholders in the review process, and described as the ACTIVE continuum of involvement. Conclusions: The ACTIVE framework provides a structure with which to describe key components of stakeholder involvement within a systematic review, and we have used this to summarize how stakeholders have been involved in a subset of varied systematic reviews. The ACTIVE continuum of involvement provides a new model that uses tasks and roles to detail the level of stakeholder involvement. This work has contributed to the development of learning resources aimed at supporting systematic review authors and editors to involve stakeholders in their systematic reviews. The ACTIVE framework may support the decision-making of systematic review authors in planning how to involve stakeholders in future reviews.
KW - systematic review, evidence synthesis, involvement, stakeholder, consumer, framework, reporting, users’ views, evidence based practice
KW - stakeholder involvement
KW - framework
KW - evidence synthesis
KW - systematic review
U2 - 10.1177/1355819619841647
DO - 10.1177/1355819619841647
M3 - Article
SN - 1355-8196
VL - 24
SP - 245
EP - 255
JO - Journal of Health Services Research and Policy
JF - Journal of Health Services Research and Policy
IS - 4
ER -