Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews

Alex Pollock, Pauline Campbell, Caroline Struthers, Anneliese Synnot, Jack Nunn, Sophie Hill, Heather Goodare, Jacqui Morris, Chris Watts, Richard Morley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

ObjectivesInvolvement of patients, health professionals, and the wider public (‘stakeholders’) is seen to be beneficial to the quality, relevance and impact of research and may enhance the usefulness and uptake of systematic reviews. However, there is a lack of evidence and resources to guide researchers in how to actively involve stakeholders in systematic reviews. In this paper, we report the development of the ACTIVE framework to describe how stakeholders are involved in systematic reviews.MethodsWe developed a framework using methods previously described in the development of conceptual frameworks relating to other areas of public involvement, including: literature searching, data extraction, analysis, and categorization. A draft ACTIVE framework was developed and then refined after presentation at a conference workshop, before being applied to a subset of 32 systematic reviews. Data extracted from these systematic reviews, identified in a systematic scoping review, were categorized against pre-define...
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)245-255
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Health Services Research and Policy
Volume24
Issue number4
Early online date18 Apr 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
Education
Health
Research

Keywords

  • systematic review, evidence synthesis, involvement, stakeholder, consumer, framework, reporting, users’ views, evidence based practice

Cite this

Pollock, Alex ; Campbell, Pauline ; Struthers, Caroline ; Synnot, Anneliese ; Nunn, Jack ; Hill, Sophie ; Goodare, Heather ; Morris, Jacqui ; Watts, Chris ; Morley, Richard. / Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews. In: Journal of Health Services Research and Policy. 2019 ; Vol. 24, No. 4. pp. 245-255.
@article{d85ae0ed40414c38acb8c85690b55c47,
title = "Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews",
abstract = "ObjectivesInvolvement of patients, health professionals, and the wider public (‘stakeholders’) is seen to be beneficial to the quality, relevance and impact of research and may enhance the usefulness and uptake of systematic reviews. However, there is a lack of evidence and resources to guide researchers in how to actively involve stakeholders in systematic reviews. In this paper, we report the development of the ACTIVE framework to describe how stakeholders are involved in systematic reviews.MethodsWe developed a framework using methods previously described in the development of conceptual frameworks relating to other areas of public involvement, including: literature searching, data extraction, analysis, and categorization. A draft ACTIVE framework was developed and then refined after presentation at a conference workshop, before being applied to a subset of 32 systematic reviews. Data extracted from these systematic reviews, identified in a systematic scoping review, were categorized against pre-define...",
keywords = "systematic review, evidence synthesis, involvement, stakeholder, consumer, framework, reporting, users’ views, evidence based practice",
author = "Alex Pollock and Pauline Campbell and Caroline Struthers and Anneliese Synnot and Jack Nunn and Sophie Hill and Heather Goodare and Jacqui Morris and Chris Watts and Richard Morley",
note = "Article has been provisionally accepted on 23/10/18. Author asked to forward on formal acceptance and record will be prioritised for validation. ET AAM: SAGE allows AAM to be made open at acceptance. Update 20/12/18 from AP: author to amend and resubmit - leaving for validation. ET Author confirmed not yet accepted at 12/3/19 by email; changed status to entry in progress and informed author. ET Asked author if now accepted ET 19/12/18 Acceptance in SAN Query to author re AAM - file was uploaded in Dec18, but paper was accepted in March19. ET 17/6/19 ^Author provided new version of AAM - uploaded 18/6/19 ET",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1355819619841647",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "245--255",
journal = "Journal of Health Services Research and Policy",
issn = "1355-8196",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "4",

}

Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews. / Pollock, Alex; Campbell, Pauline; Struthers, Caroline; Synnot, Anneliese; Nunn, Jack; Hill, Sophie; Goodare, Heather; Morris, Jacqui; Watts, Chris; Morley, Richard.

In: Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.10.2019, p. 245-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of the ACTIVE framework to describe stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews

AU - Pollock, Alex

AU - Campbell, Pauline

AU - Struthers, Caroline

AU - Synnot, Anneliese

AU - Nunn, Jack

AU - Hill, Sophie

AU - Goodare, Heather

AU - Morris, Jacqui

AU - Watts, Chris

AU - Morley, Richard

N1 - Article has been provisionally accepted on 23/10/18. Author asked to forward on formal acceptance and record will be prioritised for validation. ET AAM: SAGE allows AAM to be made open at acceptance. Update 20/12/18 from AP: author to amend and resubmit - leaving for validation. ET Author confirmed not yet accepted at 12/3/19 by email; changed status to entry in progress and informed author. ET Asked author if now accepted ET 19/12/18 Acceptance in SAN Query to author re AAM - file was uploaded in Dec18, but paper was accepted in March19. ET 17/6/19 ^Author provided new version of AAM - uploaded 18/6/19 ET

PY - 2019/10/1

Y1 - 2019/10/1

N2 - ObjectivesInvolvement of patients, health professionals, and the wider public (‘stakeholders’) is seen to be beneficial to the quality, relevance and impact of research and may enhance the usefulness and uptake of systematic reviews. However, there is a lack of evidence and resources to guide researchers in how to actively involve stakeholders in systematic reviews. In this paper, we report the development of the ACTIVE framework to describe how stakeholders are involved in systematic reviews.MethodsWe developed a framework using methods previously described in the development of conceptual frameworks relating to other areas of public involvement, including: literature searching, data extraction, analysis, and categorization. A draft ACTIVE framework was developed and then refined after presentation at a conference workshop, before being applied to a subset of 32 systematic reviews. Data extracted from these systematic reviews, identified in a systematic scoping review, were categorized against pre-define...

AB - ObjectivesInvolvement of patients, health professionals, and the wider public (‘stakeholders’) is seen to be beneficial to the quality, relevance and impact of research and may enhance the usefulness and uptake of systematic reviews. However, there is a lack of evidence and resources to guide researchers in how to actively involve stakeholders in systematic reviews. In this paper, we report the development of the ACTIVE framework to describe how stakeholders are involved in systematic reviews.MethodsWe developed a framework using methods previously described in the development of conceptual frameworks relating to other areas of public involvement, including: literature searching, data extraction, analysis, and categorization. A draft ACTIVE framework was developed and then refined after presentation at a conference workshop, before being applied to a subset of 32 systematic reviews. Data extracted from these systematic reviews, identified in a systematic scoping review, were categorized against pre-define...

KW - systematic review, evidence synthesis, involvement, stakeholder, consumer, framework, reporting, users’ views, evidence based practice

U2 - 10.1177/1355819619841647

DO - 10.1177/1355819619841647

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 245

EP - 255

JO - Journal of Health Services Research and Policy

JF - Journal of Health Services Research and Policy

SN - 1355-8196

IS - 4

ER -