TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost-effectiveness of treating upper limb spasticity due to stroke with botulinum toxin type A: results from the botulinum toxin for the upper limb after stroke (BoTULS) trial
AU - Shackley, Phil
AU - Shaw, Lisa
AU - Price, Christopher
AU - van Wijck, Frederike
AU - Barnes, Michael
AU - Graham, Laura
AU - Ford, Gary A.
AU - Steen, Nick
AU - Rodgers, Helen
N1 - Published date changed from 'Dec 2012' to '27 November 2012' as per website & VoR - CR (06/09/20)
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - Stroke imposes significant burdens on health services and society, and as such there is a growing need to assess the cost-effectiveness of stroke treatment to ensure maximum benefit is derived from limited resources. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of treating post-stroke upper limb spasticity with botulinum toxin type A plus an upper limb therapy programme against the therapy programme alone. Data on resource use and health outcomes were prospectively collected for 333 patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity taking part in a randomized trial and combined to estimate the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy relative to therapy alone. The base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy was £93,500 per QALY gained. The probability of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy being cost-effective at the England and Wales cost-effectiveness threshold value of £20,000 per QALY was 0.36. The point estimates of the ICER remained above £20,000 per QALY for a range of sensitivity analyses, and the probability of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy being cost-effective at the threshold value did not exceed 0.39, regardless of the assumptions made.
AB - Stroke imposes significant burdens on health services and society, and as such there is a growing need to assess the cost-effectiveness of stroke treatment to ensure maximum benefit is derived from limited resources. This study compared the cost-effectiveness of treating post-stroke upper limb spasticity with botulinum toxin type A plus an upper limb therapy programme against the therapy programme alone. Data on resource use and health outcomes were prospectively collected for 333 patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity taking part in a randomized trial and combined to estimate the incremental cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy relative to therapy alone. The base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy was £93,500 per QALY gained. The probability of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy being cost-effective at the England and Wales cost-effectiveness threshold value of £20,000 per QALY was 0.36. The point estimates of the ICER remained above £20,000 per QALY for a range of sensitivity analyses, and the probability of botulinum toxin type A plus therapy being cost-effective at the threshold value did not exceed 0.39, regardless of the assumptions made.
KW - botulinum toxins type A/administration & dosage
KW - combined modality therapy
KW - cost-benefit analysis
KW - upper limb spasticity
KW - muscle spasticity/economics
KW - physical therapy modalities
KW - quality-adjusted life years
KW - stroke/complications
KW - upper extremity
KW - cost-effectiveness
U2 - 10.3390/toxins4121415
DO - 10.3390/toxins4121415
M3 - Article
C2 - 23342679
SN - 2072-6651
VL - 4
SP - 1415
EP - 1426
JO - Toxins
JF - Toxins
IS - 12
ER -