Compliant, complacent or panicked? Investigating the problematisation of the Australian general public in pandemic influenza control

Mark Davis, Niamh Stephenson, Paul Flowers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

his article examines how pandemic influenza control policies interpellate the public. We analyse Australian pandemic control documents and key informant interviews, with reference to the H1N1 virus in 2009. Our analysis suggests that the episodic and uncertain features of pandemic influenza give control measures a pronounced tactical character. The general public is seen as passive and, in some cases, vulnerable to pandemic influenza. Communication focuses on promoting public compliance with prescribed guidelines, but without inspiring complacency, panic or other unruly responses. These assumptions depend, however, on a limited social imaginary of publics responding to pandemics. Drawing on Foucault, we consider how it is that these assumptions regarding the public responses to pandemics have taken their present form. We show that the virological modelling used in planning and health securitisation both separate pandemic control from its publics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)912-918
Number of pages7
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume72
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2011

Fingerprint

Pandemics
Human Influenza
contagious disease
H1N1 Subtype Influenza A Virus
Health Planning
Panic
planning
Public Policy
Influenza
General Public
Problematization
communication
present
interview
health
Communication
Guidelines
Interviews

Keywords

  • influenza control
  • pandemic
  • public

Cite this

@article{d5ff0781e7bf47f2a2884f372da1ee6f,
title = "Compliant, complacent or panicked? Investigating the problematisation of the Australian general public in pandemic influenza control",
abstract = "his article examines how pandemic influenza control policies interpellate the public. We analyse Australian pandemic control documents and key informant interviews, with reference to the H1N1 virus in 2009. Our analysis suggests that the episodic and uncertain features of pandemic influenza give control measures a pronounced tactical character. The general public is seen as passive and, in some cases, vulnerable to pandemic influenza. Communication focuses on promoting public compliance with prescribed guidelines, but without inspiring complacency, panic or other unruly responses. These assumptions depend, however, on a limited social imaginary of publics responding to pandemics. Drawing on Foucault, we consider how it is that these assumptions regarding the public responses to pandemics have taken their present form. We show that the virological modelling used in planning and health securitisation both separate pandemic control from its publics.",
keywords = "influenza control, pandemic, public",
author = "Mark Davis and Niamh Stephenson and Paul Flowers",
note = "<p>Originally published in: Social Science and Medicine (2011), 72 (6), pp.912-918.</p>",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.016",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "912--918",
journal = "Social Science and Medicine",
issn = "0277-9536",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "6",

}

Compliant, complacent or panicked? Investigating the problematisation of the Australian general public in pandemic influenza control. / Davis, Mark; Stephenson, Niamh; Flowers, Paul.

In: Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 72, No. 6, 01.03.2011, p. 912-918.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Compliant, complacent or panicked? Investigating the problematisation of the Australian general public in pandemic influenza control

AU - Davis, Mark

AU - Stephenson, Niamh

AU - Flowers, Paul

N1 - <p>Originally published in: Social Science and Medicine (2011), 72 (6), pp.912-918.</p>

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - his article examines how pandemic influenza control policies interpellate the public. We analyse Australian pandemic control documents and key informant interviews, with reference to the H1N1 virus in 2009. Our analysis suggests that the episodic and uncertain features of pandemic influenza give control measures a pronounced tactical character. The general public is seen as passive and, in some cases, vulnerable to pandemic influenza. Communication focuses on promoting public compliance with prescribed guidelines, but without inspiring complacency, panic or other unruly responses. These assumptions depend, however, on a limited social imaginary of publics responding to pandemics. Drawing on Foucault, we consider how it is that these assumptions regarding the public responses to pandemics have taken their present form. We show that the virological modelling used in planning and health securitisation both separate pandemic control from its publics.

AB - his article examines how pandemic influenza control policies interpellate the public. We analyse Australian pandemic control documents and key informant interviews, with reference to the H1N1 virus in 2009. Our analysis suggests that the episodic and uncertain features of pandemic influenza give control measures a pronounced tactical character. The general public is seen as passive and, in some cases, vulnerable to pandemic influenza. Communication focuses on promoting public compliance with prescribed guidelines, but without inspiring complacency, panic or other unruly responses. These assumptions depend, however, on a limited social imaginary of publics responding to pandemics. Drawing on Foucault, we consider how it is that these assumptions regarding the public responses to pandemics have taken their present form. We show that the virological modelling used in planning and health securitisation both separate pandemic control from its publics.

KW - influenza control

KW - pandemic

KW - public

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-79953076418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.016

DO - 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.016

M3 - Article

VL - 72

SP - 912

EP - 918

JO - Social Science and Medicine

JF - Social Science and Medicine

SN - 0277-9536

IS - 6

ER -