Comparison of vibrational comfort assessment criteria for design of timber floors among the European countries

Ben Zhang, Brigit Rasmussen, Andre Jorissen, Annette Harte

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

As part of the research work carried out by the Working Group 3 of COST Action FP0702, the need for vibrational comfort design for buildings and current regulations for comfort assessment of structural vibrations of timber floors in Europe have been summarised. Also the design practices of timber floors with respect to vibrational serviceability criteria, including those for fundamental frequency, unit point load deflection and unit impulse velocity, in up to thirteen European countries have been gathered and their differences been further assessed by analysing flooring systems constructed with three types of joists, i.e. solid timber joists, engineered I-joists and metal web joists. The unit point load deflection criterion is the most crucial one for structural design of timber floors with various types of joists and usually dominates the whole design. Finland tends to be the strictest, followed by Italy, the Netherlands, Austria and Norway, while Denmark, the UK and Ireland are the most generous.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)592-607
Number of pages16
JournalEngineering Structures
Volume52
Early online date17 Apr 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Timber
Structural design
Metals

Keywords

  • timber floors
  • serviceability limit state
  • eurocodes
  • design regulations

Cite this

Zhang, Ben ; Rasmussen, Brigit ; Jorissen, Andre ; Harte, Annette. / Comparison of vibrational comfort assessment criteria for design of timber floors among the European countries. In: Engineering Structures. 2013 ; Vol. 52. pp. 592-607.
@article{9ba28c5f50a24d258dbf9e704ba5f3d6,
title = "Comparison of vibrational comfort assessment criteria for design of timber floors among the European countries",
abstract = "As part of the research work carried out by the Working Group 3 of COST Action FP0702, the need for vibrational comfort design for buildings and current regulations for comfort assessment of structural vibrations of timber floors in Europe have been summarised. Also the design practices of timber floors with respect to vibrational serviceability criteria, including those for fundamental frequency, unit point load deflection and unit impulse velocity, in up to thirteen European countries have been gathered and their differences been further assessed by analysing flooring systems constructed with three types of joists, i.e. solid timber joists, engineered I-joists and metal web joists. The unit point load deflection criterion is the most crucial one for structural design of timber floors with various types of joists and usually dominates the whole design. Finland tends to be the strictest, followed by Italy, the Netherlands, Austria and Norway, while Denmark, the UK and Ireland are the most generous.",
keywords = "timber floors, serviceability limit state, eurocodes, design regulations",
author = "Ben Zhang and Brigit Rasmussen and Andre Jorissen and Annette Harte",
year = "2013",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.028",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "592--607",
journal = "Engineering Structures",
issn = "0141-0296",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

Comparison of vibrational comfort assessment criteria for design of timber floors among the European countries. / Zhang, Ben; Rasmussen, Brigit; Jorissen, Andre; Harte, Annette.

In: Engineering Structures, Vol. 52, 07.2013, p. 592-607.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of vibrational comfort assessment criteria for design of timber floors among the European countries

AU - Zhang, Ben

AU - Rasmussen, Brigit

AU - Jorissen, Andre

AU - Harte, Annette

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - As part of the research work carried out by the Working Group 3 of COST Action FP0702, the need for vibrational comfort design for buildings and current regulations for comfort assessment of structural vibrations of timber floors in Europe have been summarised. Also the design practices of timber floors with respect to vibrational serviceability criteria, including those for fundamental frequency, unit point load deflection and unit impulse velocity, in up to thirteen European countries have been gathered and their differences been further assessed by analysing flooring systems constructed with three types of joists, i.e. solid timber joists, engineered I-joists and metal web joists. The unit point load deflection criterion is the most crucial one for structural design of timber floors with various types of joists and usually dominates the whole design. Finland tends to be the strictest, followed by Italy, the Netherlands, Austria and Norway, while Denmark, the UK and Ireland are the most generous.

AB - As part of the research work carried out by the Working Group 3 of COST Action FP0702, the need for vibrational comfort design for buildings and current regulations for comfort assessment of structural vibrations of timber floors in Europe have been summarised. Also the design practices of timber floors with respect to vibrational serviceability criteria, including those for fundamental frequency, unit point load deflection and unit impulse velocity, in up to thirteen European countries have been gathered and their differences been further assessed by analysing flooring systems constructed with three types of joists, i.e. solid timber joists, engineered I-joists and metal web joists. The unit point load deflection criterion is the most crucial one for structural design of timber floors with various types of joists and usually dominates the whole design. Finland tends to be the strictest, followed by Italy, the Netherlands, Austria and Norway, while Denmark, the UK and Ireland are the most generous.

KW - timber floors

KW - serviceability limit state

KW - eurocodes

KW - design regulations

U2 - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.028

DO - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.03.028

M3 - Article

VL - 52

SP - 592

EP - 607

JO - Engineering Structures

JF - Engineering Structures

SN - 0141-0296

ER -