Abstract
We present examples of existing evidence that lead us to be cautious about claims made in the original paper [Blavatskyy PR (2011) A model of probabilistic choice satisfying first-order stochastic dominance. Management Sci. 57(3):542–548] that the proposed model provides a better fit to experimental data than do existing models. We raise concerns about the accuracy of this and other assertions and about the adequacy of the comparisons made with alternative models in the existing literature.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1346-1350 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Management Science |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 4 Nov 2013 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - May 2014 |
Keywords
- decision analysis
- risk
- economics
- microeconomic behaviour
- probabilistic choice functions
Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comment on “A model of probabilistic choice satisfying first-order stochastic dominance” by Pavlo Blavatskyy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Cite this
Loomes, G., Rodríguez-Puerta, I., & Pinto-Prades, J. L. (2014). Comment on “A model of probabilistic choice satisfying first-order stochastic dominance” by Pavlo Blavatskyy. Management Science, 60(5), 1346-1350. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1810