The present article discusses the three main approaches to violence risk assessment, clinical judgement, actuarial assessment, and structured clinical judgement, informing the reader of the comparative benefits and short-comings of these methods of violence risk assessment. In particular, the present article highlights the controversy within the literature surrounding clinical judgement in comparison to actuarial assessments of violence risk, and proposes that the statistically significant ‘improvements’ of violence prediction when using actuarial scales in comparison to clinical predictions of dangerousness do not necessarily measure the skill of the clinician adequately.
|Number of pages||22|
|Journal||Europe's Journal of Psychology|
|Publication status||Published - 1 Feb 2010|
- structured clinical judgement
- clinical judgement
- actuarial assessment
- violence risk assessment