Clinical ethics committees in the United Kingdom: towards evaluation

Laura Williamson, Sheila McLean, Judith Connell

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    n the United Kingdom there is a growing conviction that CECs have an important role to play in helping health care professionals address ethical dilemmas. For example, the Royal College of Physicians, the Nuffield Trust and the unofficial Clinical Ethics Network, which has received financial support from the Department of Health, commend the use of CECs in the UK. The growth of such committees has been influenced by the legal and policy support they have received in the United States. However, there is increasing concern about both the benefits and the quality of work produced by CECs. In addition, despite the rapid increase in the number of CECs in the UK, outside of the United States they remain under-researched and no formal mechanism exists to assess their performance. As a result we know little about the structure, function, impact and effectiveness of CECs. We are currently conducting a research project funded by the Wellcome Trust that seeks to interrogate the competing claims regarding the benefits and disbenefits of CECs. This initial account of our research provides a detailed analysis of theoretical issues that surround the development and use of CECs and points towards the questions that lie at the heart of the social science strand of our project.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)221-237
    Number of pages17
    JournalMedical Law International
    Volume8
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sep 2007

    Fingerprint

    research project
    social science
    moral philosophy
    physician
    health care
    health
    evaluation
    performance

    Keywords

    • clinical ethics
    • CECs
    • medical ethics
    • health policy

    Cite this

    Williamson, Laura ; McLean, Sheila ; Connell, Judith . / Clinical ethics committees in the United Kingdom: towards evaluation. In: Medical Law International . 2007 ; Vol. 8, No. 3. pp. 221-237.
    @article{e639c42faaf348998671fd1260b045a0,
    title = "Clinical ethics committees in the United Kingdom: towards evaluation",
    abstract = "n the United Kingdom there is a growing conviction that CECs have an important role to play in helping health care professionals address ethical dilemmas. For example, the Royal College of Physicians, the Nuffield Trust and the unofficial Clinical Ethics Network, which has received financial support from the Department of Health, commend the use of CECs in the UK. The growth of such committees has been influenced by the legal and policy support they have received in the United States. However, there is increasing concern about both the benefits and the quality of work produced by CECs. In addition, despite the rapid increase in the number of CECs in the UK, outside of the United States they remain under-researched and no formal mechanism exists to assess their performance. As a result we know little about the structure, function, impact and effectiveness of CECs. We are currently conducting a research project funded by the Wellcome Trust that seeks to interrogate the competing claims regarding the benefits and disbenefits of CECs. This initial account of our research provides a detailed analysis of theoretical issues that surround the development and use of CECs and points towards the questions that lie at the heart of the social science strand of our project.",
    keywords = "clinical ethics , CECs, medical ethics, health policy",
    author = "Laura Williamson and Sheila McLean and Judith Connell",
    year = "2007",
    month = "9",
    doi = "10.1177/096853320700800302",
    language = "English",
    volume = "8",
    pages = "221--237",
    journal = "Medical Law International",
    issn = "0968-5332",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications",
    number = "3",

    }

    Clinical ethics committees in the United Kingdom: towards evaluation. / Williamson, Laura; McLean, Sheila ; Connell, Judith .

    In: Medical Law International , Vol. 8, No. 3, 09.2007, p. 221-237.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Clinical ethics committees in the United Kingdom: towards evaluation

    AU - Williamson, Laura

    AU - McLean, Sheila

    AU - Connell, Judith

    PY - 2007/9

    Y1 - 2007/9

    N2 - n the United Kingdom there is a growing conviction that CECs have an important role to play in helping health care professionals address ethical dilemmas. For example, the Royal College of Physicians, the Nuffield Trust and the unofficial Clinical Ethics Network, which has received financial support from the Department of Health, commend the use of CECs in the UK. The growth of such committees has been influenced by the legal and policy support they have received in the United States. However, there is increasing concern about both the benefits and the quality of work produced by CECs. In addition, despite the rapid increase in the number of CECs in the UK, outside of the United States they remain under-researched and no formal mechanism exists to assess their performance. As a result we know little about the structure, function, impact and effectiveness of CECs. We are currently conducting a research project funded by the Wellcome Trust that seeks to interrogate the competing claims regarding the benefits and disbenefits of CECs. This initial account of our research provides a detailed analysis of theoretical issues that surround the development and use of CECs and points towards the questions that lie at the heart of the social science strand of our project.

    AB - n the United Kingdom there is a growing conviction that CECs have an important role to play in helping health care professionals address ethical dilemmas. For example, the Royal College of Physicians, the Nuffield Trust and the unofficial Clinical Ethics Network, which has received financial support from the Department of Health, commend the use of CECs in the UK. The growth of such committees has been influenced by the legal and policy support they have received in the United States. However, there is increasing concern about both the benefits and the quality of work produced by CECs. In addition, despite the rapid increase in the number of CECs in the UK, outside of the United States they remain under-researched and no formal mechanism exists to assess their performance. As a result we know little about the structure, function, impact and effectiveness of CECs. We are currently conducting a research project funded by the Wellcome Trust that seeks to interrogate the competing claims regarding the benefits and disbenefits of CECs. This initial account of our research provides a detailed analysis of theoretical issues that surround the development and use of CECs and points towards the questions that lie at the heart of the social science strand of our project.

    KW - clinical ethics

    KW - CECs

    KW - medical ethics

    KW - health policy

    U2 - 10.1177/096853320700800302

    DO - 10.1177/096853320700800302

    M3 - Article

    VL - 8

    SP - 221

    EP - 237

    JO - Medical Law International

    JF - Medical Law International

    SN - 0968-5332

    IS - 3

    ER -