Clinical effectiveness: systematic reviews and evidence-based practice in occupational therapy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Evidence-based health care can be defined as an approach to health care that involves finding and using up-to-date research into the effectiveness of health care interventions to inform decision making (Entwistle et al, 1996). For many occupational therapists, the practicalities of keeping up to date with the best research evidence is difficult; however, through the National Health Service Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (NHS CRD), the NHS Research and Development (R&D) Programme is aiming to improve the availability of high quality research evidence to all health care professionals. The NHS CRD carries out and commissions systematic reviews. Systematic reviews are a means of pulling together large quantities of research information and are considered to be one of the most reliable sources of information about effectiveness (Chalmers and Altman, 1995). The NHS CRD also disseminates the findings of systematic reviews, one method of which is through the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE). The relevance of systematic reviews to the clinical practice of occupational therapists is explored in this paper using two examples: a poor quality and a high quality systematic review identified from the abstracting process for DARE. Both reviews are directly relevant to occupational therapy, being about sensory integration and falls in the elderly respectively. The implications of these reviews for evidence-based practice in occupational therapy are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)479-483
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Occupational Therapy
Volume60
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 1997

Fingerprint

Occupational Therapy
Evidence-Based Practice
National Health Programs
Research
Delivery of Health Care
Databases
Decision Making
Occupational Therapists

Keywords

  • evidence based health-care
  • health care professionals
  • NHS CRD
  • NHS R&D
  • DARE
  • systematic reviews
  • occupational therapy

Cite this

@article{31a5718f0f14453db9059da0d957a527,
title = "Clinical effectiveness: systematic reviews and evidence-based practice in occupational therapy",
abstract = "Evidence-based health care can be defined as an approach to health care that involves finding and using up-to-date research into the effectiveness of health care interventions to inform decision making (Entwistle et al, 1996). For many occupational therapists, the practicalities of keeping up to date with the best research evidence is difficult; however, through the National Health Service Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (NHS CRD), the NHS Research and Development (R&D) Programme is aiming to improve the availability of high quality research evidence to all health care professionals. The NHS CRD carries out and commissions systematic reviews. Systematic reviews are a means of pulling together large quantities of research information and are considered to be one of the most reliable sources of information about effectiveness (Chalmers and Altman, 1995). The NHS CRD also disseminates the findings of systematic reviews, one method of which is through the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE). The relevance of systematic reviews to the clinical practice of occupational therapists is explored in this paper using two examples: a poor quality and a high quality systematic review identified from the abstracting process for DARE. Both reviews are directly relevant to occupational therapy, being about sensory integration and falls in the elderly respectively. The implications of these reviews for evidence-based practice in occupational therapy are discussed.",
keywords = "evidence based health-care, health care professionals, NHS CRD, NHS R&D, DARE, systematic reviews, occupational therapy",
author = "Katrina Bannigan",
year = "1997",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/030802269706001105",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "479--483",
journal = "British Journal of Occupational Therapy",
issn = "0308-0226",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "11",

}

Clinical effectiveness: systematic reviews and evidence-based practice in occupational therapy. / Bannigan, Katrina.

In: British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 60, No. 11, 01.11.1997, p. 479-483.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinical effectiveness: systematic reviews and evidence-based practice in occupational therapy

AU - Bannigan, Katrina

PY - 1997/11/1

Y1 - 1997/11/1

N2 - Evidence-based health care can be defined as an approach to health care that involves finding and using up-to-date research into the effectiveness of health care interventions to inform decision making (Entwistle et al, 1996). For many occupational therapists, the practicalities of keeping up to date with the best research evidence is difficult; however, through the National Health Service Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (NHS CRD), the NHS Research and Development (R&D) Programme is aiming to improve the availability of high quality research evidence to all health care professionals. The NHS CRD carries out and commissions systematic reviews. Systematic reviews are a means of pulling together large quantities of research information and are considered to be one of the most reliable sources of information about effectiveness (Chalmers and Altman, 1995). The NHS CRD also disseminates the findings of systematic reviews, one method of which is through the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE). The relevance of systematic reviews to the clinical practice of occupational therapists is explored in this paper using two examples: a poor quality and a high quality systematic review identified from the abstracting process for DARE. Both reviews are directly relevant to occupational therapy, being about sensory integration and falls in the elderly respectively. The implications of these reviews for evidence-based practice in occupational therapy are discussed.

AB - Evidence-based health care can be defined as an approach to health care that involves finding and using up-to-date research into the effectiveness of health care interventions to inform decision making (Entwistle et al, 1996). For many occupational therapists, the practicalities of keeping up to date with the best research evidence is difficult; however, through the National Health Service Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (NHS CRD), the NHS Research and Development (R&D) Programme is aiming to improve the availability of high quality research evidence to all health care professionals. The NHS CRD carries out and commissions systematic reviews. Systematic reviews are a means of pulling together large quantities of research information and are considered to be one of the most reliable sources of information about effectiveness (Chalmers and Altman, 1995). The NHS CRD also disseminates the findings of systematic reviews, one method of which is through the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE). The relevance of systematic reviews to the clinical practice of occupational therapists is explored in this paper using two examples: a poor quality and a high quality systematic review identified from the abstracting process for DARE. Both reviews are directly relevant to occupational therapy, being about sensory integration and falls in the elderly respectively. The implications of these reviews for evidence-based practice in occupational therapy are discussed.

KW - evidence based health-care

KW - health care professionals

KW - NHS CRD

KW - NHS R&D

KW - DARE

KW - systematic reviews

KW - occupational therapy

U2 - 10.1177/030802269706001105

DO - 10.1177/030802269706001105

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 479

EP - 483

JO - British Journal of Occupational Therapy

JF - British Journal of Occupational Therapy

SN - 0308-0226

IS - 11

ER -