Abstract
The current political climate in the UK is arguably more conducive to
associationalism than previous regimes. This paper engages with Paul Hirst’s work,
focusing in particular on the legal and regulatory conditions that would need to be in place to support a transition towards associative democracy. The social economy is the obvious vehicle for associational reform. However, an analysis of the legal and
regulatory forms associated with the social economy in the UK indicates that the
current framework will not easily facilitate transition. The analysis opens up
challenging questions for how to regulate the democratic element of associative
democracy.
associationalism than previous regimes. This paper engages with Paul Hirst’s work,
focusing in particular on the legal and regulatory conditions that would need to be in place to support a transition towards associative democracy. The social economy is the obvious vehicle for associational reform. However, an analysis of the legal and
regulatory forms associated with the social economy in the UK indicates that the
current framework will not easily facilitate transition. The analysis opens up
challenging questions for how to regulate the democratic element of associative
democracy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 151-176 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Economy and Society |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 30 Apr 2012 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2012 |
Keywords
- associative democracy
- Paul Hirst
- Big Society
- regulation
- social economy
- social enterprise