Are there better assays to evaluate the risk of transmission of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) to human cells?

Joachim Denner; Linda Scobie

doi:10.1111/xen.12510

Are there better assays to evaluate the risk of transmission of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) to human cells?

Joachim Denner, Linda Scobie

Biological and Biomedical Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Article number	e12510
Number of pages	3
Journal	Xenotransplantation
Volume	26
Issue number	4
Early online date	1 Apr 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/xen.12510
Publication status	Published - 29 Aug 2019

Keywords

retrovirus
PERVs
human cells
transmission

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Documents and Links

10.1111/xen.12510

Cite this

@article{6cc4886c366946aa8eeb95c4e53d2070,

title = "Are there better assays to evaluate the risk of transmission of porcine endogenous retroviruses (PERVs) to human cells?",

keywords = "retrovirus, PERVs, human cells, transmission",

author = "Joachim Denner and Linda Scobie",

note = "Issue not published yet - ELL 05/04/19 Acceptance from webpage. ",

year = "2019",

month = aug,

day = "29",

doi = "10.1111/xen.12510",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

journal = "Xenotransplantation",

issn = "1399-3089",