Are social innovation paradigms incommensurable?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This paper calls attention to the problematic use of the concept of social innovation which remains undefined despite its proliferation throughout academic and policy discourses. Extant research has thus far failed to capture the socio-political contentions which surround social innovation. This paper therefore draws upon the work of Thomas Kuhn and conducts a paradigmatic analysis of the field of social innovation which identifies two emerging schools: one technocratic, the other democratic. The paper identifies some of the key thinkers in each paradigm and explains how the struggle between these two paradigms reveals itself to be part of a broader conflict between neoliberalism and it opponents and concludes by arguing that future research focused upon local contextualised struggles will reveal which paradigm is in the ascendancy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1979-2000
Number of pages22
JournalVoluntas
Volume27
Issue number4
Early online date18 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2016

Fingerprint

paradigm
innovation
neoliberalism
proliferation
discourse
school

Keywords

  • social innovation
  • depoliticisation
  • paradigm
  • neoliberalism

Cite this

@article{256c87f563c24819a0656d17173b94c1,
title = "Are social innovation paradigms incommensurable?",
abstract = "This paper calls attention to the problematic use of the concept of social innovation which remains undefined despite its proliferation throughout academic and policy discourses. Extant research has thus far failed to capture the socio-political contentions which surround social innovation. This paper therefore draws upon the work of Thomas Kuhn and conducts a paradigmatic analysis of the field of social innovation which identifies two emerging schools: one technocratic, the other democratic. The paper identifies some of the key thinkers in each paradigm and explains how the struggle between these two paradigms reveals itself to be part of a broader conflict between neoliberalism and it opponents and concludes by arguing that future research focused upon local contextualised struggles will reveal which paradigm is in the ascendancy.",
keywords = "social innovation, depoliticisation, paradigm, neoliberalism",
author = "Thomas Montgomery",
note = "Online pub: 18-2-16 OA in Voluntas No funder mentioned",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1007/s11266-016-9688-1",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1979--2000",
journal = "Voluntas",
issn = "2179-3786",
number = "4",

}

Are social innovation paradigms incommensurable? / Montgomery, Thomas.

In: Voluntas, Vol. 27, No. 4, 08.2016, p. 1979-2000.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are social innovation paradigms incommensurable?

AU - Montgomery, Thomas

N1 - Online pub: 18-2-16 OA in Voluntas No funder mentioned

PY - 2016/8

Y1 - 2016/8

N2 - This paper calls attention to the problematic use of the concept of social innovation which remains undefined despite its proliferation throughout academic and policy discourses. Extant research has thus far failed to capture the socio-political contentions which surround social innovation. This paper therefore draws upon the work of Thomas Kuhn and conducts a paradigmatic analysis of the field of social innovation which identifies two emerging schools: one technocratic, the other democratic. The paper identifies some of the key thinkers in each paradigm and explains how the struggle between these two paradigms reveals itself to be part of a broader conflict between neoliberalism and it opponents and concludes by arguing that future research focused upon local contextualised struggles will reveal which paradigm is in the ascendancy.

AB - This paper calls attention to the problematic use of the concept of social innovation which remains undefined despite its proliferation throughout academic and policy discourses. Extant research has thus far failed to capture the socio-political contentions which surround social innovation. This paper therefore draws upon the work of Thomas Kuhn and conducts a paradigmatic analysis of the field of social innovation which identifies two emerging schools: one technocratic, the other democratic. The paper identifies some of the key thinkers in each paradigm and explains how the struggle between these two paradigms reveals itself to be part of a broader conflict between neoliberalism and it opponents and concludes by arguing that future research focused upon local contextualised struggles will reveal which paradigm is in the ascendancy.

KW - social innovation

KW - depoliticisation

KW - paradigm

KW - neoliberalism

U2 - 10.1007/s11266-016-9688-1

DO - 10.1007/s11266-016-9688-1

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 1979

EP - 2000

JO - Voluntas

JF - Voluntas

SN - 2179-3786

IS - 4

ER -