An anthropological approach to the social contract

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

The social contract tradition relies on idealised or hypothetical stories of cultural and social evolution, which are used to justify agreement on political and moral issues. Hobbes starts from a pre-social state of human interaction to argue for a social contract that regulates political and moral behaviour. He used a plausible story because he could not have used anthropological evidence or sources. However, today we can consider evidence from both History and Anthropology to examine the evolution and development of social contracts and argue about the evolution of morality and politics. Binmore used anthropological evidence to argue for a social contract that revolves around egalitarian ideals. A closer examination of such anthropological evidence with special focus on social contracts established in different cultures and times can help us better understand and evaluate the mainstream social contract tradition from Hobbes to Rawls. Subsequently, we can gain a better and deeper understanding of contemporary ideals of morality and justice. Anthropology allows us to consider social contracts over time and distance; there have been societies living in isolation that have developed their own social contracts. A comparative analysis of real-life social contracts that have evolved independently, in conjunction with the theoretical tradition of contractarianism can offer unique insights into individual agency and social structure, and ultimately the evolution of social and moral norms.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - May 2019

Fingerprint

morality
evidence
anthropology
social structure
social isolation
justice
examination
politics
history
interaction
society
time

Keywords

  • social contract
  • anthropology
  • social evolution

Cite this

@conference{4b7b422aa4714320aa9a9ecd1625de3a,
title = "An anthropological approach to the social contract",
abstract = "The social contract tradition relies on idealised or hypothetical stories of cultural and social evolution, which are used to justify agreement on political and moral issues. Hobbes starts from a pre-social state of human interaction to argue for a social contract that regulates political and moral behaviour. He used a plausible story because he could not have used anthropological evidence or sources. However, today we can consider evidence from both History and Anthropology to examine the evolution and development of social contracts and argue about the evolution of morality and politics. Binmore used anthropological evidence to argue for a social contract that revolves around egalitarian ideals. A closer examination of such anthropological evidence with special focus on social contracts established in different cultures and times can help us better understand and evaluate the mainstream social contract tradition from Hobbes to Rawls. Subsequently, we can gain a better and deeper understanding of contemporary ideals of morality and justice. Anthropology allows us to consider social contracts over time and distance; there have been societies living in isolation that have developed their own social contracts. A comparative analysis of real-life social contracts that have evolved independently, in conjunction with the theoretical tradition of contractarianism can offer unique insights into individual agency and social structure, and ultimately the evolution of social and moral norms.",
keywords = "social contract, anthropology, social evolution",
author = "Vangelis Chiotis",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
language = "English",

}

An anthropological approach to the social contract. / Chiotis, Vangelis.

2019.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

TY - CONF

T1 - An anthropological approach to the social contract

AU - Chiotis, Vangelis

PY - 2019/5

Y1 - 2019/5

N2 - The social contract tradition relies on idealised or hypothetical stories of cultural and social evolution, which are used to justify agreement on political and moral issues. Hobbes starts from a pre-social state of human interaction to argue for a social contract that regulates political and moral behaviour. He used a plausible story because he could not have used anthropological evidence or sources. However, today we can consider evidence from both History and Anthropology to examine the evolution and development of social contracts and argue about the evolution of morality and politics. Binmore used anthropological evidence to argue for a social contract that revolves around egalitarian ideals. A closer examination of such anthropological evidence with special focus on social contracts established in different cultures and times can help us better understand and evaluate the mainstream social contract tradition from Hobbes to Rawls. Subsequently, we can gain a better and deeper understanding of contemporary ideals of morality and justice. Anthropology allows us to consider social contracts over time and distance; there have been societies living in isolation that have developed their own social contracts. A comparative analysis of real-life social contracts that have evolved independently, in conjunction with the theoretical tradition of contractarianism can offer unique insights into individual agency and social structure, and ultimately the evolution of social and moral norms.

AB - The social contract tradition relies on idealised or hypothetical stories of cultural and social evolution, which are used to justify agreement on political and moral issues. Hobbes starts from a pre-social state of human interaction to argue for a social contract that regulates political and moral behaviour. He used a plausible story because he could not have used anthropological evidence or sources. However, today we can consider evidence from both History and Anthropology to examine the evolution and development of social contracts and argue about the evolution of morality and politics. Binmore used anthropological evidence to argue for a social contract that revolves around egalitarian ideals. A closer examination of such anthropological evidence with special focus on social contracts established in different cultures and times can help us better understand and evaluate the mainstream social contract tradition from Hobbes to Rawls. Subsequently, we can gain a better and deeper understanding of contemporary ideals of morality and justice. Anthropology allows us to consider social contracts over time and distance; there have been societies living in isolation that have developed their own social contracts. A comparative analysis of real-life social contracts that have evolved independently, in conjunction with the theoretical tradition of contractarianism can offer unique insights into individual agency and social structure, and ultimately the evolution of social and moral norms.

KW - social contract

KW - anthropology

KW - social evolution

UR - https://aissr.uva.nl/content/events/conferences/2019/05/ppa-conference.html?1572947201223

M3 - Paper

ER -