Affective equality: love matters

Sara Cantillon, Kathleen Lynch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The nurturing that produces love, care, and solidarity constitutes a discrete social system of affective relations. Affective relations are not social derivatives, subordinate to economic, political, or cultural relations in matters of social justice. Rather, they are productive, materialist human relations that constitute people mentally, emotionally, physically, and socially. As love laboring is highly gendered, and is a form of work that is both inalienable and noncommodifiable, affective relations are therefore sites of political import for social justice. We argue that it is impossible to have gender justice without relational justice in loving and caring. Moreover, if love is to thrive as a valued social practice, public policies need to be directed by norms of love, care, and solidarity rather than norms of capital accumulation. To promote equality in the affective domains of loving and caring, we argue for a four-dimensional rather than a three-dimensional model of social justice as proposed by Nancy Fraser (2008). Such a model would align relational justice, especially in love laboring, with the equalization of resources, respect, and representation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169–186
Number of pages18
JournalHypatia
Volume32
Issue number1
Early online date9 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

love
equality
social justice
justice
solidarity
human relations
political relations
cultural relations
capital accumulation
social system
import
respect
public policy
Equality
Affective
gender
resources
economics
Social Justice
Justice

Keywords

  • affective equality, social justice, Fraser, model of political equality

Cite this

Cantillon, Sara ; Lynch, Kathleen. / Affective equality: love matters. In: Hypatia. 2017 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 169–186.
@article{d129beafd7cf492d84d565aed51443bd,
title = "Affective equality: love matters",
abstract = "The nurturing that produces love, care, and solidarity constitutes a discrete social system of affective relations. Affective relations are not social derivatives, subordinate to economic, political, or cultural relations in matters of social justice. Rather, they are productive, materialist human relations that constitute people mentally, emotionally, physically, and socially. As love laboring is highly gendered, and is a form of work that is both inalienable and noncommodifiable, affective relations are therefore sites of political import for social justice. We argue that it is impossible to have gender justice without relational justice in loving and caring. Moreover, if love is to thrive as a valued social practice, public policies need to be directed by norms of love, care, and solidarity rather than norms of capital accumulation. To promote equality in the affective domains of loving and caring, we argue for a four-dimensional rather than a three-dimensional model of social justice as proposed by Nancy Fraser (2008). Such a model would align relational justice, especially in love laboring, with the equalization of resources, respect, and representation.",
keywords = "affective equality, social justice, Fraser, model of political equality",
author = "Sara Cantillon and Kathleen Lynch",
note = "AAM provided 7-3-17; 24m embargo Acceptance date from journal webpage",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1111/hypa.12305",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "169–186",
journal = "Hypatia",
issn = "0887-5367",
publisher = "John Wiley & Sons",
number = "1",

}

Affective equality: love matters. / Cantillon, Sara; Lynch, Kathleen.

In: Hypatia, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2017, p. 169–186.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Affective equality: love matters

AU - Cantillon, Sara

AU - Lynch, Kathleen

N1 - AAM provided 7-3-17; 24m embargo Acceptance date from journal webpage

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The nurturing that produces love, care, and solidarity constitutes a discrete social system of affective relations. Affective relations are not social derivatives, subordinate to economic, political, or cultural relations in matters of social justice. Rather, they are productive, materialist human relations that constitute people mentally, emotionally, physically, and socially. As love laboring is highly gendered, and is a form of work that is both inalienable and noncommodifiable, affective relations are therefore sites of political import for social justice. We argue that it is impossible to have gender justice without relational justice in loving and caring. Moreover, if love is to thrive as a valued social practice, public policies need to be directed by norms of love, care, and solidarity rather than norms of capital accumulation. To promote equality in the affective domains of loving and caring, we argue for a four-dimensional rather than a three-dimensional model of social justice as proposed by Nancy Fraser (2008). Such a model would align relational justice, especially in love laboring, with the equalization of resources, respect, and representation.

AB - The nurturing that produces love, care, and solidarity constitutes a discrete social system of affective relations. Affective relations are not social derivatives, subordinate to economic, political, or cultural relations in matters of social justice. Rather, they are productive, materialist human relations that constitute people mentally, emotionally, physically, and socially. As love laboring is highly gendered, and is a form of work that is both inalienable and noncommodifiable, affective relations are therefore sites of political import for social justice. We argue that it is impossible to have gender justice without relational justice in loving and caring. Moreover, if love is to thrive as a valued social practice, public policies need to be directed by norms of love, care, and solidarity rather than norms of capital accumulation. To promote equality in the affective domains of loving and caring, we argue for a four-dimensional rather than a three-dimensional model of social justice as proposed by Nancy Fraser (2008). Such a model would align relational justice, especially in love laboring, with the equalization of resources, respect, and representation.

KW - affective equality, social justice, Fraser, model of political equality

U2 - 10.1111/hypa.12305

DO - 10.1111/hypa.12305

M3 - Article

VL - 32

SP - 169

EP - 186

JO - Hypatia

JF - Hypatia

SN - 0887-5367

IS - 1

ER -