A review of the leading performance measurement tools for assessing buildings

Gavin McDougall; John R. Kelly; John Hinks; Umit S. Bititci

doi:10.1108/14725960310807881

A review of the leading performance measurement tools for assessing buildings

Gavin McDougall, John R. Kelly, John Hinks, Umit S. Bititci

Glasgow Caledonian University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

With the purpose of creating a forum for discussion on the scope and nature of building performance evaluation. This paper provides a definition of performance measurement from an organisational perspective, and a review of three leading industry tools for post-occupancy evaluation that examines the gap between evaluation and measurement. The paper concludes by asking what role facilities managers might play in building performance appraisal, what barriers cost imposes on measurement of the built infrastructure, and what are the limitations regarding the methods included in the review.

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of Facilities Management
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1108/14725960310807881
Publication status	Published - 1 Jun 2002

Keywords

facilities management
building performance evaluation

Documents and Links

10.1108/14725960310807881

http://researchonline.gcu.ac.uk/bne/19

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A review of the leading performance measurement tools for assessing buildings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{bcdc715b78e44895809927004a14297a,

title = "A review of the leading performance measurement tools for assessing buildings",

abstract = "With the purpose of creating a forum for discussion on the scope and nature of building performance evaluation. This paper provides a definition of performance measurement from an organisational perspective, and a review of three leading industry tools for post-occupancy evaluation that examines the gap between evaluation and measurement. The paper concludes by asking what role facilities managers might play in building performance appraisal, what barriers cost imposes on measurement of the built infrastructure, and what are the limitations regarding the methods included in the review.",

keywords = "facilities management, building performance evaluation",

author = "Gavin McDougall and Kelly, {John R.} and John Hinks and Bititci, {Umit S.}",

note = "Originally published in: Journal of Facilities Management (2002), 1 (2), pp.142-153.",

year = "2002",

month = jun,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1108/14725960310807881",

language = "English",

journal = "Journal of Facilities Management",

issn = "1472-5967",

publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A review of the leading performance measurement tools for assessing buildings

AU - McDougall, Gavin

AU - Kelly, John R.

AU - Hinks, John

AU - Bititci, Umit S.

N1 - Originally published in: Journal of Facilities Management (2002), 1 (2), pp.142-153.

PY - 2002/6/1

Y1 - 2002/6/1

N2 - With the purpose of creating a forum for discussion on the scope and nature of building performance evaluation. This paper provides a definition of performance measurement from an organisational perspective, and a review of three leading industry tools for post-occupancy evaluation that examines the gap between evaluation and measurement. The paper concludes by asking what role facilities managers might play in building performance appraisal, what barriers cost imposes on measurement of the built infrastructure, and what are the limitations regarding the methods included in the review.

AB - With the purpose of creating a forum for discussion on the scope and nature of building performance evaluation. This paper provides a definition of performance measurement from an organisational perspective, and a review of three leading industry tools for post-occupancy evaluation that examines the gap between evaluation and measurement. The paper concludes by asking what role facilities managers might play in building performance appraisal, what barriers cost imposes on measurement of the built infrastructure, and what are the limitations regarding the methods included in the review.

KW - facilities management

KW - building performance evaluation

U2 - 10.1108/14725960310807881

DO - 10.1108/14725960310807881

M3 - Article

JO - Journal of Facilities Management

JF - Journal of Facilities Management

SN - 1472-5967

ER -