A review of implementation and evaluation frameworks for public health interventions to inform co-creation: a Health CASCADE study

Giuliana Raffaella Longworth*, Kunshan Goh, Danielle Marie Agnello, Katrina Messiha, Melanie Beeckman, Jorge Raul Zapata-Restrepo, Greet Cardon, Sebastien Chastin, Maria Giné-Garriga

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: By including the needs and perspectives of relevant stakeholders, co-creation is seen as a promising approach for tackling complex public health problems. However, recommendations and guidance on how to plan and implement co-creation are lacking. By identifying and analysing existing implementation and evaluation frameworks for public health, this study aims to offer key recommendations for professional stakeholders and researchers wanting to adopt a co-creation approach to public health interventions. Methods: Firstly, PubMed and CINAHL databases were screened for articles introducing original implementation and evaluation frameworks for public health interventions. Backwards snowballing techniques were applied to the included papers. Secondly, identified frameworks were classified and relevant data extracted, including steps and constructs present in the frameworks. Lastly, recommendations were derived by conducting thematic analysis on the included frameworks. Results: Thirty frameworks were identified and data related to their nature and scope extracted. The frameworks’ prominent steps and constructs were also retrieved. Recommendations related to implementation and evaluation in the context of co-creation were included. Conclusion: When engaging in co-creation, we recommend including implementation considerations from an early stage and suggest adopting a systems thinking as a way to explore multiple levels of influence, contextual settings and systems from an early planning stage. We highlight the importance of partnering with stakeholders and suggest applying an evaluation design that is iterative and cyclical, which pays particular attention to the experience of the engaged co-creators.

Original languageEnglish
Article number39
Number of pages12
JournalHealth Research Policy and Systems
Volume22
Issue number1
Early online date28 Mar 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 28 Mar 2024

Keywords

  • Co-creation
  • Evaluation
  • Evidence-based
  • Framework
  • Implementation
  • Public health
  • Review
  • Systems thinking

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A review of implementation and evaluation frameworks for public health interventions to inform co-creation: a Health CASCADE study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this