A political critique of kantian ethics in social work

Stephen A. Webb, Graham B. McBeath*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper addresses the Kantian theory of the subject which is found in contemporary social work discourse on ethics and values. It is argued here that the Kantian idea of persons as (i) rational, (ii) autonomous, and (iii) ends-in-themselves is wholly inadequate to the social work doctrine of ‘respect for persons’. To show this, we counterpose a Foucauldian view of history, moral codes and theory of the person, and the meaning this can have in the social worker-client relation. This alternative reading claims that social work is essentially a political practice which is constructed by various discursive and institutional strategies of power. Therefore, it is suggested that social work needs a political reading of its own discourse. To this end we outline a Foucauldian micro-political analysis of the social work ‘subject’ or person as a point within a field of discursive-knowledge based strategies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)491-506
Number of pages16
JournalBritish Journal of Social Work
Volume19
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 1989
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A political critique of kantian ethics in social work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this