A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement

Sarah Wallace, Linda worrall, Tanya Rose, Guylaine LeDorze, Caterina Breitenstein, Katerina Hilari, Edna Babbitt, Arpita Bose, Marian Brady, Leora Cherney, David Copland, Madeline Cruice, Pamela Enderby, Deborah Hersh, Tami Howe, Helen Kelly, Swathi Kiran, Ann-Charlotte Laska, Jane Marshall, Marjorie NicholasJanette Patterson, Gill Pearl, Miranda Rose, Karen Sage, Steven Small, Janet Webster

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: A core outcome set (COS; an agreed, minimum set of outcomes) was needed to address the heterogeneous measurement of outcomes in aphasia treatment research and to facilitate the production of transparent, meaningful and efficient outcome data.
Objective: The Research Outcome Measurement in Aphasia (ROMA) consensus statement provides evidence-based recommendations for the measurement of outcomes for adults with post-stroke aphasia within phase I-IV aphasia treatment studies.
Methods: This statement was informed by a four-year program of research which comprised investigation of stakeholder-important outcomes using consensus processes, a scoping review of aphasia outcome measurement instruments, and an international consensus meeting. This paper provides an overview of this process and presents the results and recommendations arising from the international consensus meeting.
Results: Five essential outcome constructs were identified: Language, communication, patient-reported satisfaction with treatment and impact of treatment, emotional wellbeing, and quality of life. Consensus was reached for the following measurement instruments: Language: The Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WAB-R) (74% consensus); emotional well-being: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12 (83% consensus); quality of life: Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) (96% consensus). Consensus was unable to be reached for measures of communication (where multiple measures exist) or patient-reported satisfaction with treatment or impact of treatment (where no measures exist).
Discussion: Harmonisation of the ROMA COS with other core outcome initiatives in stroke rehabilitation is discussed. Ongoing research and consensus processes are outlined.
Conclusion: The WAB-R, GHQ, and SAQOL-39 are recommended to be routinely included within phase I-IV aphasia treatment studies. This consensus statement has been endorsed by the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists, the British Aphasiology Society, the German Society for Aphasia Research and Therapy, and the Royal College of Speech Language Therapists.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)180-185
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Stroke
Volume14
Issue number2
Early online date10 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

Aphasia
Consensus
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Research
Language
Quality of Life
Therapeutics
Patient Satisfaction
Stroke
Communication
Health

Keywords

  • aphasia treatment
  • core outcome set
  • stroke patients

Cite this

Wallace, S., worrall, L., Rose, T., LeDorze, G., Breitenstein, C., Hilari, K., ... Webster, J. (2019). A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement. International Journal of Stroke, 14(2), 180-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493018806200
Wallace, Sarah ; worrall, Linda ; Rose, Tanya ; LeDorze, Guylaine ; Breitenstein, Caterina ; Hilari, Katerina ; Babbitt, Edna ; Bose, Arpita ; Brady, Marian ; Cherney, Leora ; Copland, David ; Cruice, Madeline ; Enderby, Pamela ; Hersh, Deborah ; Howe, Tami ; Kelly, Helen ; Kiran, Swathi ; Laska, Ann-Charlotte ; Marshall, Jane ; Nicholas, Marjorie ; Patterson, Janette ; Pearl, Gill ; Rose, Miranda ; Sage, Karen ; Small, Steven ; Webster, Janet . / A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement. In: International Journal of Stroke. 2019 ; Vol. 14, No. 2. pp. 180-185.
@article{002b8b69133147aab6629390b178c160,
title = "A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement",
abstract = "Background: A core outcome set (COS; an agreed, minimum set of outcomes) was needed to address the heterogeneous measurement of outcomes in aphasia treatment research and to facilitate the production of transparent, meaningful and efficient outcome data. Objective: The Research Outcome Measurement in Aphasia (ROMA) consensus statement provides evidence-based recommendations for the measurement of outcomes for adults with post-stroke aphasia within phase I-IV aphasia treatment studies.Methods: This statement was informed by a four-year program of research which comprised investigation of stakeholder-important outcomes using consensus processes, a scoping review of aphasia outcome measurement instruments, and an international consensus meeting. This paper provides an overview of this process and presents the results and recommendations arising from the international consensus meeting. Results: Five essential outcome constructs were identified: Language, communication, patient-reported satisfaction with treatment and impact of treatment, emotional wellbeing, and quality of life. Consensus was reached for the following measurement instruments: Language: The Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WAB-R) (74{\%} consensus); emotional well-being: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12 (83{\%} consensus); quality of life: Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) (96{\%} consensus). Consensus was unable to be reached for measures of communication (where multiple measures exist) or patient-reported satisfaction with treatment or impact of treatment (where no measures exist). Discussion: Harmonisation of the ROMA COS with other core outcome initiatives in stroke rehabilitation is discussed. Ongoing research and consensus processes are outlined. Conclusion: The WAB-R, GHQ, and SAQOL-39 are recommended to be routinely included within phase I-IV aphasia treatment studies. This consensus statement has been endorsed by the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists, the British Aphasiology Society, the German Society for Aphasia Research and Therapy, and the Royal College of Speech Language Therapists.",
keywords = "aphasia treatment, core outcome set, stroke patients",
author = "Sarah Wallace and Linda worrall and Tanya Rose and Guylaine LeDorze and Caterina Breitenstein and Katerina Hilari and Edna Babbitt and Arpita Bose and Marian Brady and Leora Cherney and David Copland and Madeline Cruice and Pamela Enderby and Deborah Hersh and Tami Howe and Helen Kelly and Swathi Kiran and Ann-Charlotte Laska and Jane Marshall and Marjorie Nicholas and Janette Patterson and Gill Pearl and Miranda Rose and Karen Sage and Steven Small and Janet Webster",
note = "Acceptance in SAN AAM: no embargo",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1747493018806200",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "180--185",
journal = "International Journal of Stroke",
issn = "1747-4930",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Wallace, S, worrall, L, Rose, T, LeDorze, G, Breitenstein, C, Hilari, K, Babbitt, E, Bose, A, Brady, M, Cherney, L, Copland, D, Cruice, M, Enderby, P, Hersh, D, Howe, T, Kelly, H, Kiran, S, Laska, A-C, Marshall, J, Nicholas, M, Patterson, J, Pearl, G, Rose, M, Sage, K, Small, S & Webster, J 2019, 'A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement', International Journal of Stroke, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 180-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493018806200

A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement. / Wallace, Sarah; worrall, Linda; Rose, Tanya; LeDorze, Guylaine; Breitenstein, Caterina; Hilari, Katerina; Babbitt, Edna; Bose, Arpita; Brady, Marian; Cherney, Leora; Copland, David; Cruice, Madeline; Enderby, Pamela ; Hersh, Deborah; Howe, Tami; Kelly, Helen; Kiran, Swathi; Laska, Ann-Charlotte ; Marshall, Jane; Nicholas, Marjorie ; Patterson, Janette; Pearl, Gill; Rose, Miranda; Sage, Karen ; Small, Steven; Webster, Janet .

In: International Journal of Stroke, Vol. 14, No. 2, 01.02.2019, p. 180-185.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement

AU - Wallace, Sarah

AU - worrall, Linda

AU - Rose, Tanya

AU - LeDorze, Guylaine

AU - Breitenstein, Caterina

AU - Hilari, Katerina

AU - Babbitt, Edna

AU - Bose, Arpita

AU - Brady, Marian

AU - Cherney, Leora

AU - Copland, David

AU - Cruice, Madeline

AU - Enderby, Pamela

AU - Hersh, Deborah

AU - Howe, Tami

AU - Kelly, Helen

AU - Kiran, Swathi

AU - Laska, Ann-Charlotte

AU - Marshall, Jane

AU - Nicholas, Marjorie

AU - Patterson, Janette

AU - Pearl, Gill

AU - Rose, Miranda

AU - Sage, Karen

AU - Small, Steven

AU - Webster, Janet

N1 - Acceptance in SAN AAM: no embargo

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Background: A core outcome set (COS; an agreed, minimum set of outcomes) was needed to address the heterogeneous measurement of outcomes in aphasia treatment research and to facilitate the production of transparent, meaningful and efficient outcome data. Objective: The Research Outcome Measurement in Aphasia (ROMA) consensus statement provides evidence-based recommendations for the measurement of outcomes for adults with post-stroke aphasia within phase I-IV aphasia treatment studies.Methods: This statement was informed by a four-year program of research which comprised investigation of stakeholder-important outcomes using consensus processes, a scoping review of aphasia outcome measurement instruments, and an international consensus meeting. This paper provides an overview of this process and presents the results and recommendations arising from the international consensus meeting. Results: Five essential outcome constructs were identified: Language, communication, patient-reported satisfaction with treatment and impact of treatment, emotional wellbeing, and quality of life. Consensus was reached for the following measurement instruments: Language: The Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WAB-R) (74% consensus); emotional well-being: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12 (83% consensus); quality of life: Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) (96% consensus). Consensus was unable to be reached for measures of communication (where multiple measures exist) or patient-reported satisfaction with treatment or impact of treatment (where no measures exist). Discussion: Harmonisation of the ROMA COS with other core outcome initiatives in stroke rehabilitation is discussed. Ongoing research and consensus processes are outlined. Conclusion: The WAB-R, GHQ, and SAQOL-39 are recommended to be routinely included within phase I-IV aphasia treatment studies. This consensus statement has been endorsed by the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists, the British Aphasiology Society, the German Society for Aphasia Research and Therapy, and the Royal College of Speech Language Therapists.

AB - Background: A core outcome set (COS; an agreed, minimum set of outcomes) was needed to address the heterogeneous measurement of outcomes in aphasia treatment research and to facilitate the production of transparent, meaningful and efficient outcome data. Objective: The Research Outcome Measurement in Aphasia (ROMA) consensus statement provides evidence-based recommendations for the measurement of outcomes for adults with post-stroke aphasia within phase I-IV aphasia treatment studies.Methods: This statement was informed by a four-year program of research which comprised investigation of stakeholder-important outcomes using consensus processes, a scoping review of aphasia outcome measurement instruments, and an international consensus meeting. This paper provides an overview of this process and presents the results and recommendations arising from the international consensus meeting. Results: Five essential outcome constructs were identified: Language, communication, patient-reported satisfaction with treatment and impact of treatment, emotional wellbeing, and quality of life. Consensus was reached for the following measurement instruments: Language: The Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WAB-R) (74% consensus); emotional well-being: General Health Questionnaire (GHQ)-12 (83% consensus); quality of life: Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale (SAQOL-39) (96% consensus). Consensus was unable to be reached for measures of communication (where multiple measures exist) or patient-reported satisfaction with treatment or impact of treatment (where no measures exist). Discussion: Harmonisation of the ROMA COS with other core outcome initiatives in stroke rehabilitation is discussed. Ongoing research and consensus processes are outlined. Conclusion: The WAB-R, GHQ, and SAQOL-39 are recommended to be routinely included within phase I-IV aphasia treatment studies. This consensus statement has been endorsed by the Collaboration of Aphasia Trialists, the British Aphasiology Society, the German Society for Aphasia Research and Therapy, and the Royal College of Speech Language Therapists.

KW - aphasia treatment

KW - core outcome set

KW - stroke patients

U2 - 10.1177/1747493018806200

DO - 10.1177/1747493018806200

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 180

EP - 185

JO - International Journal of Stroke

JF - International Journal of Stroke

SN - 1747-4930

IS - 2

ER -

Wallace S, worrall L, Rose T, LeDorze G, Breitenstein C, Hilari K et al. A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: the ROMA consensus statement. International Journal of Stroke. 2019 Feb 1;14(2):180-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493018806200