A comparison of two methods for estimating polymegethism in cell areas of the human corneal endothelium

Michael Doughty, Emil Oblak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the outcome measures from two different methods for estimating the coefficient of variation (COV) in cell area for human corneal endothelia. A single non-contact specular micrograph was obtained from the central region of the corneal endothelium of 100 healthy non-contact lens-wearing white European subjects, aged from 32 to 62 years. The captured image file was either assessed using a machine-based algorithm in which 21 cells were marked and their areas reported (designated as the TOPCON ‘centre-dot’ method), or by an overlay and semi-automated computer-based image analysis system of the entire image of around 200 cells (designated as the AUTO method). The average cell area values were used to calculate the endothelial cell density (ECD), while the COV was calculated from the standard deviation of the cell area measures.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)47-56
Number of pages10
JournalOphthalmic and Physiological Optics
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2008

Keywords

  • endothelium
  • cornea
  • optometry
  • morphometry
  • vision sciences

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of two methods for estimating polymegethism in cell areas of the human corneal endothelium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this