A comparison of office workers’ co-creation experiences: a health CASCADE multiple case study

Lauren McCaffrey*, Janneke deBoer, Mira Vogelsang, Maria Giné-Garriga, Bryan McCann, Philippa Dall

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives
Co-creation can used to develop public health interventions, improve their effectiveness, and increase intervention uptake through engaging stakeholders, but there is little in-depth exploration of the co-creators’ experience of taking part. Understanding the experience of taking part in a co-creation process can enhance future participation experiences, promote engagement and help design better co-creation processes in the future. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of co-creators (i.e., office workers) involved in the co-creation process to address workplace sedentary behaviour.

Study design
Multiple case study.

Methods
Three small-to-medium sized enterprises participated in separate co-creation processes. Data were generated from observations during the workshops and semi-structured interviews (n = 31) employing elicitation techniques conducted after the co-creation process was completed. Each of the three cases were analysed separately (using thematic analysis), which then informed the cross-case comparison, the focus of this study.

Results
Comparison of co-creators' experiences across the three cases identified psychological, emotional, social and cognitive experiences which occurred before, during and after the co-creation process. The analysis identified both intended (e.g., sedentary behaviour awareness) and unintended (e.g., forming relationships) outcomes from these experiences. These experiences and outcomes were influenced by factors such as workplace environment and structure, design of the co-creation process and how it was facilitated, highlighting the interplay between the co-creation context and the broader work context.

Conclusion
This study contributes to the understanding of co-creation experience in the workplace setting. Recommendations were derived from using an iterative reflection process of the three cases.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-82
Number of pages8
JournalPublic Health
Volume241
Early online date16 Feb 2025
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 16 Feb 2025

Keywords

  • participatory
  • co-design
  • workplace
  • evaluation
  • group dynamics
  • perceptions
  • Evaluation
  • Co-design
  • Perceptions
  • Group dynamics
  • Workplace
  • Participatory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of office workers’ co-creation experiences: a health CASCADE multiple case study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this