A can of worms: has visual communication a postion of influence on aesthetics of interaction?

Dave Wood

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Interaction Design is a young discipline that grew out of an overlap of other science and design disciplines, its remit was the design of interactive products, services and systems for human behaviour. Visual Communication and its output of graphic design once had an early influence on Interaction Design, but this has since been devalued by the influence from more functionalist disciplines, leading to two myths about Visual Communication: it just does the ‘aesthetic bit’ on the interface, and that aesthetics has no real use or function beyond ‘beauty’. But aesthetics cannot be reduced and measured as a functionalist equation of ‘means-end’. By understanding aesthetics from a Pragmatist philosophical position, the aesthetics of interaction can be explored from a situated and culturally connected embodiment of an interactive experience. From this position aesthetics is viewed as emergent from the interactive experience through three factors: a socio-cultural context, a personal embodiment and finally a means-to-many-ends instrumentality. It is a cultural phenomenon and not an engineering problem that can be explored quantifiably. This makes this a phenomenological study, and closer to Visual Communication.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)463-476
    Number of pages14
    JournalDesign Principles and Practices: an International Journal
    Volume5
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2011

      Fingerprint

    Keywords

    • interaction design
    • aesthetics
    • visual communication

    Cite this