Podcast: A discussion with Dr Lee John Curley and Dr Hayley Ness on juror decision-making research

Related content

• Research Outputs

• Authors' response

  Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

• Juries are subject to all kinds of biases when it comes to deciding on a trial

  Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

• Scotland’s ‘not proven’ verdict does affect jurors decisions – but removing it may not improve rape conviction rates

  Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

• Are legal experts better decision makers than jurors? A psychological evaluation of the role of juries in the 21st century

  Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

• Not proven and back again: an academics’ tale

  Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

• Are consistent juror decisions related to fast and frugal decision making? Investigating the relationship between juror consistency, decision speed and cue utilisation

  Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

• Jurors who believe rape myths contribute to dismal conviction rates – but judge-only trials won’t solve the problem

  Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

• An inconvenient truth: more rigorous and ecologically valid research is needed to properly understand cognitive bias in forensic decisions

  Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

• Proven and not proven: a potential alternative to the current Scottish verdict system

  Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

• Artificial Intelligence and rationality as psychological issues

  Research output: Non-textual form › Web publication/site

• CSI: current research into the impact of bias on crime scene forensics is limited – but psychologists can help

  Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

• Cognitive and human factors in legal layperson decision making: sources of bias in juror decision making

  Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

• Scotland’s unique three-verdict system is put to the test as experts argue for and against scrapping not proven

  Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

• Author response: No need for throwing stones – wherever you live…

  Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

• Decision science: a new hope

  Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

• Assessing cognitive bias in forensic decisions: a review and outlook

  Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

• In dialogue with Dr Lee Curley about his talk at the OPRC launch event

  Research output: Non-textual form › Web publication/site

• Verdict spotting: investigating the effects of juror bias, evidence anchors and verdict system in jurors

  Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

• Faith in thy threshold

  Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

• The Anglo-American jury system: is there another way?

  Research output: Non-textual form › Web publication/site

• Informing reform: the views of legal professionals on the unique aspects of Scottish Law

  Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

• Juror decision making: the good, the rational, and the biased

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter (peer-reviewed)

• A critique of the experimental study of juror decision-making: challenges and recommendations

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter (peer-reviewed) › peer-review

• Double jeopardy: the effects of retrial knowledge on juror decisions

  Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

• Reforming Scotland’s unique jury system: why we need to listen to lawyers

  Research output: Contribution to specialist publication › Article

• Proof and Truth

  Research output: Non-textual form › Web publication/site

• Juror and jury decision making

  Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter (peer-reviewed)

• The effect of verdict system on juror decisions: a quantitative meta-analysis

  Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

• Bilingualism: the foreign language effect does not extend to rational decision making

  Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review